RON95 & RON97 Myths and Facts

hahahha
park your place but car keys with me....

:biggrin:

btw i am on my first tankful of v-power racing...
somehow the engine feel much smoother.... buttdyno... on highway la mostly...

P/S - which shell station in subang/PJ/klang got v-power racing?
:mad:

Got to check because no pump shell.....hahahahaha.

---------- Post added at 01:31 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 01:30 PM ----------

FC not a concern for my altis...
:biggrin:

50L for 50km also dun care...
:biggrin:

Aiyah! You drive altis only not veyron......hahahahaha.......faster Cabut

---------- Post added at 01:32 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 01:31 PM ----------

Back to 95 already.

My vr still need 97 woh......:rolleyes:
 
...

My vr still need 97 woh......:rolleyes:

Coz for me after 3 full tanks of 97 (1st tank eco run, 2nd mostly banzai run, 3rd mostly eco run with just occasional banzai), it does not give any significant benefits. FC still about the same and power not so noticeable difference as well.
 
this translates to :

cheap petrol, gives more mileage and almost same HP...
 
im using 97 after all prices went down, 97 gives more mileage then 95....thats the truth and not a myth or some BS.

yeah, plain logic...engine more responsive, u dont have to tekan so much hence u get better mileage...thats all, no nid mythodology or watever :biggrin:
 
im using 97 after all prices went down, 97 gives more mileage then 95....thats the truth and not a myth or some BS.

yeah, plain logic...engine more responsive, u dont have to tekan so much hence u get better mileage...thats all, no nid mythodology or watever :biggrin:

Myth. I get worse mileage LOL! Cuz engine more smooth, lagi nice to tekan. :biggrin:
 
im using 97 after all prices went down, 97 gives more mileage then 95....thats the truth and not a myth or some BS.

yeah, plain logic...engine more responsive, u dont have to tekan so much hence u get better mileage...thats all, no nid mythodology or watever :biggrin:

Myth. I get worse mileage LOL! Cuz engine more smooth, lagi nice to tekan. :biggrin:

Again it depends on the engine. Put 97 into normal cars like Myvi, Livina, Avanza, Alza, Wira, Gen2, City, Vios, Altis, Civic, Camry, etc2. then just wasting money only.
 
Again it depends on the engine. Put 97 into normal cars like Myvi, Livina, Avanza, Alza, Wira, Gen2, City, Vios, Altis, Civic, Camry, etc2. then just wasting money only.

For my case yes hahaha! Cuz a few did a review or test on it. Proven on facts wise if ur car dont need RON97, u wont benefit from it. Some have worse mileage than RON95 too.
 
I have tested too. My NA Hyundai and Chery SUV no difference. Only my VR need 97 to run.....:biggrin:
 
Conclusions from some experts? any sifus ?

Depends on what car used. U may google and see. Lots of review and test between the debate on Ron97 & Ron95 myths and facts. If your car don't need RON97, ur car will not feel any difference even on mileage wise. Some, after using RON97, their mileage is worse than RON95.

But some cars benefit from RON97 after pumping. So depends on your car. But also your right foot la. If u keep pedal to metal, then forget about testing lol!
 

Similar threads

Posts refresh every 5 minutes




Search

Online now

Enjoying Zerotohundred?

Log-in for an ad-less experience