twistedichc
2,000 RPM
Now I get it. He and SF purposely mix up each other's car name. Jetta for SF. Altis for kcng.
still can't figure out SF's Jetta is what car
Now I get it. He and SF purposely mix up each other's car name. Jetta for SF. Altis for kcng.
still can't figure out SF's Jetta is what car
---------------------------
Anyway, found a better article here which I think many might have already read it.
RON 95 vs RON 97 fuel test - which one should you use?
still can't figure out SF's Jetta is what car
But yours is GDi, right?
No conclusion also, both have mixed result....
...
altis turbo meh? why hp low only? but torque is really good
Now I get it. He and SF purposely mix up each other's car name. Jetta for SF. Altis for kcng.
Yes mine is GDi, Japan recommendation is to use 98.
---------- Post added at 08:16 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 08:14 PM ----------
Got conclusion: not worth the price difference! So they'll stick with 95.
No conclusion also, both have mixed result....
1.8 NA.....lol
Yes mine is GDi, Japan recommendation is to use 98.
Got conclusion: not worth the price difference! So they'll stick with 95.
But some mention GDi less problem with knocking as petrol is injected direct.
But for me, got to stick to 97 for my VR.....
Kcng's one is 1.4VVT-i. ma not TSi. His model is limited imported model from US. 1.4VVT-i with turbo.
Ya conclusion seems that for NA, RON97 seems to consume more fuel than RON95
Already mentioned many times already, when engine don't require the higher, no point using it....
if manual say min 95, how?
if manual say min 95, how?
Ya, felt the same in RON95 when I pump for Kelisa xD
Use Min loh! save mah! using lower priced fuel.......hhahahhaha
---------- Post added at 05:46 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 05:45 PM ----------
Then use 95 period, no need think about it anymore.....
Ya, kelisa sticking to RON95 if mileage is gonna be same...
But I tried RON97 from Caltex...mileage is real bad if compare to Petron. Seriously bad...about less than 100km mileage.
Ya, felt the same in RON95 when I pump for Kelisa xD
u need to refuel a few tanks only can see the diff ler...
else mostly just placebo...
like those who go kedai abang and install exhaust tip cover and claim car feel faster...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
If we think logically, RON basically just tells you how easily the petrol ignites under load (generally laaa) and RON95 ignites much earlier than 97. So the ignition timing needs to be retarded (usually automatically by the ECU) to avoid knocking (or was it advanced? Uh..) so technically you're talking about slightly less power. 97 on the other hand resists early ignition and the ignition timing can be adjusted to be more aggressive (later) so technically there is a difference in power. However in some if not most cars that power gain is so minimal it just doesn't make cost effective sense to use the higher octane since there's probably a lot of loss at the transmission anyway.
Anyway, just me rambling at 7am
Similar threads | |
---|---|