That might not be too good for this engine I guess. Especially for his exhaust manifold...
Turbo running fast needs a richer fuel feed. Too lean can overheat or burn the engine....
That might not be too good for this engine I guess. Especially for his exhaust manifold...
Turbo running fast needs a richer fuel feed. Too lean can overheat or burn the engine....
Richer fuel feed means injecting more fuel from injector which equals to increase the fuel consumption as well?
Drive turbo think of FC then might as well don't drive.....hahahahahahaa
A 2.0L engine when boost up can be like 3.0L power so the consumption is like 3.0 not 2.0.....
Then, for cars like those new german cars that uses turbo engine and they claim it can reduce fuel consumption due to the reduction of displacement, how did they do it? Or is it because those cars are running on low boost?
Probably highly tuned with very rich mixture to get that......
They are comparing say 1.4 turbo to a 2.0L NA. The 1.4 of course will have better FC.
My take was on say 2.0L NA and you turbo charged it, then turbo got worse FC. Two different thing altogether.....
@ maybe they came out wit mid boost for optimum power minimum effort
Is all in capacity. small engine turbo charged becomes big capacity also. Bigger capacity bigger appetite...
They are comparing say 1.4 turbo to a 2.0L NA. The 1.4 of course will have better FC.
My take was on say 2.0L NA and you turbo charged it, then turbo got worse FC. Two different thing altogether.....
Not to worry Malaysian fuel is "cheaper" than other regional country
The Satria is probably 2WD also. Unless the owner go crazy and equipped it with an illegal full time 4WD transmission.
Haha, VR = Evo 0 while theirs are Evo 9. Far gap indeed. BTW, will your VR spit flames from the exhaust like some of the Evo in that video? This is probably due to too much heat in the engine after such a heavy pushing on the engine?
Drive turbo think of FC then might as well don't drive.....hahahahahahaa
A 2.0L engine when boost up can be like 3.0L power so the consumption is like 3.0 not 2.0.....
...
4WD or not, one almost crashed and worse almost whacked the other car...
but now with tighter engine tolerance and new direct injection technology,including vvt, variable turbo...same displacement engine with turbo will have some better overal fc compared to the n/a similar engine......
I think one did crashed into the hill side gutter very narrowly missing a car. But probably only damaged his front bumper/splitter hence he still came back to join again up top.
---------- Post added at 09:42 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 09:27 PM ----------
If really the same engine family with all the same except maybe NA vs turbo and higher comp for the NA vs lower comp for the turbo, shouldn't the NA still be more fuel efficient? Or maybe the turbo will be more fuel efficient for the same power output, meaning the NA will have to consume more fuel to reach the same output as the turbo? I'd think it's the latter that will be more true, but CMIIW though coz I don't know much about engines not to mention forced induction ones.
Also how about turbo engines but using small sized/undersized turbo or low boost one, probably that's the one used in VW etc. hence can claim very good FC. Compared to turbo engines from Evo/STI/GTR etc. with the main goal is to achieve high performance then they become a lot more fuel thirsty.
Also how about turbo engines but using small sized/undersized turbo or low boost one, probably that's the one used in VW etc. hence can claim very good FC. Compared to turbo engines from Evo/STI/GTR etc. with the main goal is to achieve high performance then they become a lot more fuel thirsty.
They are comparing say 1.4 turbo to a 2.0L NA. The 1.4 of course will have better FC.
My take was on say 2.0L NA and you turbo charged it, then turbo got worse FC. Two different thing altogether.....
Is all in capacity. small engine turbo charged becomes big capacity also. Bigger capacity bigger appetite...
Possible that satria GTi is 4wd, since was not illegal back then.
Guess my BLM have turbo to consume more fuel than a 1.3 should hahaha
I think one did crashed into the hill side gutter very narrowly missing a car. But probably only damaged his front bumper/splitter hence he still came back to join again up top.
---------- Post added at 09:42 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 09:27 PM ----------
If really the same engine family with all the same except maybe NA vs turbo and higher comp for the NA vs lower comp for the turbo, shouldn't the NA still be more fuel efficient? Or maybe the turbo will be more fuel efficient for the same power output, meaning the NA will have to consume more fuel to reach the same output as the turbo? I'd think it's the latter that will be more true, but CMIIW though coz I don't know much about engines not to mention forced induction ones.
Also how about turbo engines but using small sized/undersized turbo or low boost one, probably that's the one used in VW etc. hence can claim very good FC. Compared to turbo engines from Evo/STI/GTR etc. with the main goal is to achieve high performance then they become a lot more fuel thirsty.
That means if 1.4 turbo compare with 1.4 NA, still 1.4 NA wins in FC but loses out in power output.
About the turbo vs NA fuel consumption, I think maybe it depends on the boost pressure? High boost = higher FC because more fuel is injected to burn those high pressure air from the turbo? Low boost = less fuel being injected?
FC can be from many things, power to weight ratio, driver, etc....
Drive turbo so far everyone I know will want to boost and boost more, Where got decrease boost one.....hahahaha
Some stock turbo engine runs on low boost only like Campro CFE. But still, I think that engine can consume more fuel than the 4B11 MIVEC in Lancer/Inspira.
BTW, din't go to TTA?
CFE FC is good! Compare to a conventional IAFM or CPS lah.
Hahaha TTA is damn onz!
Sent from my Lumia 925 using Tapatalk.
VW using twin charged system (turbo/super charged)
...
The one that crashed during the early part of the video? With black rear bonnet? Looked like Evo VIII.
About the turbo vs NA fuel consumption, I think maybe it depends on the boost pressure? High boost = higher FC because more fuel is injected to burn those high pressure air from the turbo? Low boost = less fuel being injected?
FC can be from many things, power to weight ratio, driver, etc....
Drive turbo so far everyone I know will want to boost and boost more, Where got decrease boost one.....hahahaha
Similar threads | |
---|---|