different tyre thickness at front and rear

xw4600

Known Member
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
68
Points
508
Location
Kuala Lumpur
hello all sifu's,,


i just wanna know what are the consequence if i use different tyre size for front n rear.right now i am using 215/45/r17 on both side and considering using 215/55/r17 on the front as its very bumpy ( cefiro 3.0L )....psi 31/32


ty
 
If front is 215/55/17 and rear is 215/45/17 den car will become like motorboat(sampan)... you can try 215/55/17 front and rear 225/50/17 maybe is ok..
 
hello all sifu's,,


i just wanna know what are the consequence if i use different tyre size for front n rear.right now i am using 215/45/r17 on both side and considering using 215/55/r17 on the front as its very bumpy ( cefiro 3.0L )....psi 31/32


ty

What's the std diameter btw?
Better make all 4 similar height though.
 
i all wish that i can change all 4 at once...but budget is the problem.btw 2 tyre at the front is still new ,at around 6 month and i only use it as weekend car while the other 2 is the option to be replaced.even the the new tyre has been downgraded from michelin to atlantis v7.
 
i all wish that i can change all 4 at once...but budget is the problem.btw 2 tyre at the front is still new ,at around 6 month and i only use it as weekend car while the other 2 is the option to be replaced.even the the new tyre has been downgraded from michelin to atlantis v7.

If it is temporary until the tyres gets bald then the new higher aspect ratio ones put them in the rear.
Wear the lower aspect ratio ones in the front then change another 2 to match those in the rears.
However got one more question. What is the original tyre size for your ride because you cannot simply change to a bigger tyre without calculation.
 
i think it should be 185/65R15 ( thats the tyre when i bought it 2ndhand )

Cefiro 3.0L with 186/65R15....So Small....:hmmmm:

If 185/65R15 then 215/45R17 is correct size conversion.
215/55R17 will be too big over 8% bigger.
Maybe you can go up to 215/50R17 which is 4% bigger

---------- Post added at 04:58 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 04:56 PM ----------

well... me personally use 185/55-15 front with 195/50-15 rear....no problem....

Wider in the rears is ok and better...:driver:
 
Cefiro 3.0L with 186/65R15....So Small....:hmmmm:

If 185/65R15 then 215/45R17 is correct size conversion.
215/55R17 will be too big over 8% bigger.
Maybe you can go up to 215/50R17 which is 4% bigger

---------- Post added at 04:58 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 04:56 PM ----------



Wider in the rears is ok and better...:driver:



thinking to swap wider at front...for gymkhana :biggrin:
 
Only if RWD.

Nope, even for FWD. If over steer in FWD even harder to control.....

---------- Post added at 08:57 AM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 08:54 AM ----------

thinking to swap wider at front...for gymkhana :biggrin:

My friend in GRA does that but still using same size but extreme tyres in front and normal tyres in the rear....:driver:
 
Nope, even for FWD. If over steer in FWD even harder to control.....
...


for FWD also ok since car more prone to understeer..atleast safer than snap oversteer

Hmm IMHO no, FWD car should not use wider at the rear because FWD is already prone to understeer, having such staggered setup will make it even more understeer. For me also oversteer in a FWD is easier to catch than RWD.

Anyway I guess if one wants more understeer in their FWD then it's up to them but I'd never suggest it. I agree though the understeer is generally safer for most that's why most normal cars are setup like that, even RWD ones.
 
Hmm IMHO no, FWD car should not use wider at the rear because FWD is already prone to understeer, having such staggered setup will make it even more understeer. For me also oversteer in a FWD is easier to catch than RWD.

Anyway I guess if one wants more understeer in their FWD then it's up to them but I'd never suggest it. I agree though the understeer is generally safer for most that's why most normal cars are setup like that, even RWD ones.

for you, me and other capable driver is yes... :biggrin:

but for most usual driver especially wimminz is not.... :listen:

actually my setup was like that was due to front tyre going bald pretty fast...hence just use available tyre at ease.... and since the lifespan of rear tyre is over by now (thread still around 70-80%)...might as well switch to the front before changing into new tyre afterwards :adore:
 
Hmm IMHO no, FWD car should not use wider at the rear because FWD is already prone to understeer, having such staggered setup will make it even more understeer. For me also oversteer in a FWD is easier to catch than RWD.

Anyway I guess if one wants more understeer in their FWD then it's up to them but I'd never suggest it. I agree though the understeer is generally safer for most that's why most normal cars are setup like that, even RWD ones.

Actually the best for FWD is all same size, then can rotate also. Only in temporary solution like to wear tyre out for next change and so on, then use different size.

But I easily over steer the RWD, and at times can do it to my FWD VR also....:driver:
 

Similar threads

Posts refresh every 5 minutes




Search

Online now

Enjoying Zerotohundred?

Log-in for an ad-less experience