Just some skeptical correction on the 4G91 bore... For everyone's information, it can be rebore to 81mm. Cause the 4G91 block can actually be bored to 81mm. In a cast iron industry, the most expensive cost of investment is the mould itself. And the 4G91 and 4G92 short block shares the same configuration, the manufacturer will safe the cost by having a common mould, but the after machining work(in this case cylinder boring) is different. In other words, a 4G92 is an bored to 81mm version of 4G92. And, it's already proven within my group of friends with a 4G91 bored to 81mm and fitted with 4AGZE pistons and boosting at 1.2 bar running for more than a year with no problem. And they guy drives like there's no 2moro... Keke... I'd say the only difference between the short block of 4G91 n 4G92(JDM) is the cylinder size and the oil squirts.
BTW, I've compared the 4G92 conrods and 4G93T conrods, the cross section is identical. But with a much shorter stroke(11.5 difference) and a shorter rod length. There will be much lesser stress on the rods, rod bearings and the cylinder/piston contact surface. To me, I'd say a 4G92 "GSR" is a stronger block compare to a 4G93T in terms of ability to witstand boost and rev. Meaning to say, at same RPM and same boost pressure with the same calculated compression ratio, the 4G93T is more prone to failure. But of course, the 4G92 will generate less power and torque.
Simple example, Use 2 same x sectional 10mm diameter steel rod, A with the length of 50cm, B with the length of 25cm. Try to bend it. Which one bend easier. The same thing applies in the engine when the crank is pushing the conrods at an angle.
I'm using the MIVEC/4G91/4G92 stock rods.