u r most welcome sir
again, stability isnt governed by resistance sir. by the tests dat weve done, the std / cap ayam (to a certain degree, but workable) cables are good enough for a highly modified engines. please prove my tests are wrong before u comment further, tq sir.
y do you need to know all these paramaters anyway? a 7hp loss is a 7hp loss, comparison was done on the same dyno, i dont understand ur predicament in dis matter sir. seems like u are trying to create a useless issue, what can u extract from knowing the dynamometer freq? why do u need to measure the flame propagation? just to see its characteristics? for what? a power loss is a power loss, it doesnt matter how. i will avoid things dat arent worth to spend on, and losing power when uve spend a hefty amount isnt worth it. iam stating the obvious here, and u r telling me to put down the dynamometer's resolution? there wasnt much of ignition timing difference sir, but we did made adjustment
i dont understand dis, experiments do have their purpose but not the be adhered but to take as a reference, dats all. results in real life / scenario is much more applicable sir, period.
correct, dats y all petrol engines ignition timing advances when the revv climbs, its very obvious sir. flame duration in degree? i dont understand on dat part, i dont remember saying the bolded phrase sir. i believe flame propagation is determined in the electrode design and the combustion chamber design as a whole (see GDi pistons design), not the spark intensity and certainly not the cable resistance. do u even know whats the resistance value of a typical cap ayam cable tak? check dat out and please confirm there is a substantial voltage drop across the worse cable u cud find. tq sir
---------- Post added at 04:53 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 04:50 PM ----------
i also pening dah, lol. dats what iam trying to tell him, dont make me pening with all this jargons, me orang tua sudeh..
one thing for most certain is U need to clarify how u done ur test thats why i'm asking U how u make u test so if there is certain thing that make it wrong... I would know....
I already mention what the thing I need... to ensure ur assumption is correct..if u think i bring up useless issue than let it be... flame propagation is to determine the effectiveness of the combustion means either it become complete, less or detonation combustion occurs.. if it is complete than it is the best but if it becomes less of to fast u know the result...
reference yes and also it can be used as in real situation.. but usually the ref we used is from theoretical and analytical method.. experimental procedure always as to measure things and the result being used to develop something or anything la...(too lazy keep explaining the same thing and I believe that u mention the experiment result cannot be used in real situation and can only be used as ref...)
again to lazy because already explain liow... I want to cry.. flame propagation can be measured based on time, space and degree of crank angle.. I make it simple la... 1 rotation of crank is 360degree angle right? is U want to count the flame propagation inside the complete build engine how? U must know what are the duration of mixed a/f to complete burn.. u can count with sec or U can count it with degree of angle... how much degree it will take before it complete burn the a/f mixture.. as for testing the cable resistant and its performance.. never being done by me... THATS why I ask U.. If not I already flame U maaa... and said that Ur assumption is wrong......haiiyoooo... now i really want to cry I even mention that my knowledge in electrical is low and almost to none, do U understand what it means ha? The things is, I only have different opinion with u is based on my I.C.E knowledge maa... so if U can prove what U said about no different so better stick with stock cable please give an explanation but don't keep answering that u have done the test with the dyno and blalalalalabalala... for me the asnwer is rubbish. why like i mention before dyno wheels is not sensitive enough and the results is based on after the output of the wheels which already to many losses from the friction of the wheels, power transfer from dry shaft to the wheels, transmission transfer to the dry shaft, power losses from transmission fluid, engine fluid, engine coolant (relate to temperature and it performance also duration of blabalbalbalbla.. I keep babbling again) and so on and on...... thats why i keep asking U what is the prove based on engineering analysis...
haiyoo.. I'm also sudah tua maaa... (tp hati muda la.
).. the problem is U keep avoiding answer my question (or maybe I'm not fully understand your explanation because my english sooo bad) which is simple what actually U do and including other question I already ask that make U mention, there is no different either in std/cap ayam/ performance cable plug and "other thing in ignition" (saja tambah2 hahahaah)
...U said U don't wan to explain with all the jargons in electrical terms that would make this forum become pening so I ask U to P.M me maa...still u keep avoiding to fully give the answer..and keep attacking me.. can I ask why? now i'm crying
heheheheh...
I keep ask question to u because based on ur explanation...it seems u truly understand what actually happen and u like a person who work either as an engineer or lecturer something.. or maybe my perception about u is wrong?
for me if u already done the experiment u must know how or what to answer all the question maa. based on the fact backup with ur engneering knowledge ma.... If not ur test is questionable...
to other people really sorry laa... my curiosity drive me nuts... if he yet don't want to explained (pm me la with the answer or u can pm me how u done ur test so maybe we can pm each other) and keep changing and going back and forward with his answer... I will stop posting ok... realllyyyyy sorry again...