- Joined
- Apr 18, 2006
- Messages
- 3,677
- Points
- 1,663
Opinions/thoughts wanted: Oversized valves versus high lift, long duration cams.
Okay, admittedly being a newbie at ZTH Honda forum,
I'd like to know your experiences with headwork choices for the B16,B18 or the B20.
I've seen that most people go for higher lift cams with longer durations for more power, but I've never seen a Malaysian honda with oversized intake and exhaust valve ports on their 'head'. (not that head!)
I'm guessing that the oversized intake and exhaust valve ports allow you to run those super high compression pistons with more extreme concave surfaces without hitting the valves, but I've yet seen a car using those instead of high lift, long duration cams.
Have you guys seen one? I wonder if it's a better choice if going full NA, with no plans for turbo. I'm just wondering the rationale behind doing things that way. It doen't matter if it generates less power, I'm just trying the 'think different' philosophy by apple. :retarded:
Okay, admittedly being a newbie at ZTH Honda forum,
I'd like to know your experiences with headwork choices for the B16,B18 or the B20.
I've seen that most people go for higher lift cams with longer durations for more power, but I've never seen a Malaysian honda with oversized intake and exhaust valve ports on their 'head'. (not that head!)
I'm guessing that the oversized intake and exhaust valve ports allow you to run those super high compression pistons with more extreme concave surfaces without hitting the valves, but I've yet seen a car using those instead of high lift, long duration cams.
Have you guys seen one? I wonder if it's a better choice if going full NA, with no plans for turbo. I'm just wondering the rationale behind doing things that way. It doen't matter if it generates less power, I'm just trying the 'think different' philosophy by apple. :retarded:
Last edited: