Condo Management Fee

ixeo : fazidk hit the nail on the head when he stated hanky panky along with many of our brethren albeit in different words.

Lets recap:-

1. Availability of tenancy agreement between businessman and JMC is unsure at the moment! A stamped copy MUST be in JMC office, dig it out. No tenancy agreement, no reimbursement whatsoever and nothing to discuss. This clearly shows JMC at fault for allowing third party to operate in within its premises without any agreement whatsoever.

2. This case is between residents and JMC, as the committee also comprises of elected members or appointed residents in the condo to act on behalf of the condo residents interests. Not between the residents and the businessman. I believe there is and should have a by-law on JMC, try to get the statutes and study them and see what options are available to you if JMC is improperly managed. You may want to consider hiring a lawyer or at least together with the residents after you are clear on what option you may want to exercise.

No matter what, if you do reach that stage, you would really want to know who would be available for election and having the proper credentials for the job, otherwise it back to square one!

Out of curiosity I have a 2 questions:-

A. How long has the business been in operation?
B. How much losses is the businessman claiming against the JMC for his "RND" research and development failure?

A. 31 years.
B. Claiming "incentive" of RM1.7 billion. The businessman never used the word "claim", "grant" or "reimbursement"
 
ixeo:

A: 31 years of lossess??? Hmmmm Does it make any sense for a businessman to call it quits after 31 years of lossess?

B: My apologies, at times I do like to use associated words to link with other recent events. Anyway back to issue at hand, the incentive claimed it beyond logic irregardless of whatever its term maybe and RM1.7billion incentive!!! I thought only Proton was claiming that amount or something similar to that figure!!! That amount can probably take us in fact all of us ZTH members around the moon a couple of times. So face with a staggering amount, I strongly suggest you and all the residents start planning about who's going to burn the midnight oil and best of luck!
 
Then change the scenario. You are staying in Tropicana Gated & Guarded. You pay monthly maintenance fees. A restaurant opened in the club house, not doing well, want to be be incentivized by Tropicana JMC for his renovated and development of the restaurant.

Anjua?

Later I will reveal the name of this restaurant....and the condo..

Open restaurant not a business venture? Same if you open else where right? Open in club house or some where else no difference....

---------- Post added at 05:02 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 04:59 PM ----------

A. 31 years.
B. Claiming "incentive" of RM1.7 billion. The businessman never used the word "claim", "grant" or "reimbursement"

What? 31 years? If survive 31 years, business where got loss?

---------- Post added at 05:05 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 05:02 PM ----------

Slimmer than toothpicks.

Nowadays stay condo also can be richer than those with house la bro. :rofl: Like yours adi cost more than house price at certain areas :rofl:

Yup, high end ones cost more then house and still got to pay monthly maintenance, so in a way still got rent to pay....:bawling:
 
loh i thought real bcoz where i live..

last time JMC is a high ranking criminal pedophile somemore..

has strong connections with politics (sorry to say but PKR that's why PKR lost in Kota Damansara)
 

Similar threads

Z
6 7 8
Replies
149
Views
9K
Z
Replies
39
Views
3K

Posts refresh every 5 minutes




Search

Online now

Enjoying Zerotohundred?

Log-in for an ad-less experience