marsha1l_v6
500 RPM
Car: perdana v6
Year : 2000
Engine : stock 6a12 V6 DOHC 24V
Mileage : 222xxx km (daily driving,go holiday anywhere i go this car is my ride)
Transmission : auto 4
Upgrade in mind :
With that info, im in the mist of getting ecu , so planning to keep engine stock and hoping that with the piggyback could squeeze a lil bit performance and give a better fc and/or low rpm pickup.
i am not sure when but i do have plan to transplant vr4 in it depends which come first (engine block spoil or got extra $$ or no)
so whats your opinion? sifu also experience user. Does it bring more good than harm?
read some google result and give a mix opinion.
Year : 2000
Engine : stock 6a12 V6 DOHC 24V
Mileage : 222xxx km (daily driving,go holiday anywhere i go this car is my ride)
Transmission : auto 4
Upgrade in mind :
- piggyback ecu
- adjustable suspension
- brake
- aesthetic (bodykit,rim,semi bucket)
With that info, im in the mist of getting ecu , so planning to keep engine stock and hoping that with the piggyback could squeeze a lil bit performance and give a better fc and/or low rpm pickup.
i am not sure when but i do have plan to transplant vr4 in it depends which come first (engine block spoil or got extra $$ or no)
so whats your opinion? sifu also experience user. Does it bring more good than harm?

read some google result and give a mix opinion.
If you have a n/a car and you are planning on boosting it, there really is only one reasonable choice. A stand alone ecu. This is because a naturally aspirated cars ecu is programmed for a na engine. The main concern is your ignition timing. An na tuned car (i.e your stock car) will have ignition maps that are way to advanced for a boosted application causing detonation, which is detrimental to your engine.
Well doesn’t a a/f controller and piggy back computer control ignition timing?
Yes but not effectively. An a/f controller takes readings from your maf/map sensor and alters them trick your ecu into reading a different signal. And since all your maps are tied in together, your maf/map sensor signal also will move where your ecu reads its ignition timing on the map. your maf/map is not only used to maintain air/fuel, but its also used by the ecu to determine load, and load is used for determining timing advance, this has the side effect of fooling the ecu into advancing timing beyond what is safe. These readings will also effect where your cam angle is, which more then likely will not be at the optimal angle for your boosted application.
Newer piggy backs like the e-manage ultimate can control your ignition timing separately from your airflow readings, but there are still catches. You are able to change ignition timing maps but the e-manage simply changes the output signal the ecu sends to the coils. The problem is the ignition timing numbers are not always consistent with the changes you make to the load sensor, whether its your map, or maf sensor. So you are guessing the timing numbers. The stock ecu also has multiple maps it can run for different conditions so you are not always consistent with the tune.
A stand alone ecu lets you build, from scratch, completely new ignition timing maps and fuel maps and cam angle maps. Optimal for your boosted application so you can run a safer tune that will make more power.
A car that has come from the factory already has optimal ignition timing maps and there for really only needs a a/f controller or a piggy back that can compensate in a relatively small window range. Unless you plan on drastically changing your stock boosted air flow characteristics, a piggy back will suit you just fine.
quoted from: http://forums.superstreetonline.com
Last edited: