Pls recommend new or used 2.0 cars below rm 100k

How's you Optra maintenance so far? Fuel Consumption bad?

I bought the optra in 2011 for only RM28k. It has been with me for 2 years so far maintenance is no problem. Only the normal wear & tear i.e. replace brake pad, spark plugs, fuel filter, battery, change motor oil & oil filter. I think it is a good buy for used car. However, whoever bought it brand new will curse the car cause it depreciate too much. I already use to owning a 2.0 cars for the past 10 years so the fuel is no problem for me even though it is a bit more compare to Japanese cars.:driver:



---------- Post added at 07:06 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 06:58 PM ----------

before the optra my ride was altis 1.8 year 2007. I like the beige leather seat and interior. Optra's interior also is beige leather seat. So I sold my altis for RM 77k and bought optra for only RM 28k. How much do I have saved and the ride is almost the same. Optra is better at cornering and going through speed bumps.

---------- Post added at 07:14 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 07:06 PM ----------

My rough history of owning a car:
1992 to 1993 Accord 2.0 1989
1994 to 1995 Accord 2.0 1991
1995 t0 1997 Telstar 2.0 1994
1997 to 2000 wira disel 2.0 1997
2000 to 2003 wira vr4 2.0
2003 to 2007 wira 1.8
2007 to 2011 Altis 1.8
2011 to 2013 optra 1.8
 
I thought it was a completely new model?

Haha! I say that cause it front look almost the same but the rear to me like using back the idea of this old accord design and reconstruct it from there. To me la.

Ya new one using SOHC engine also for the 2.0L. 2.4L is somewhat go green engine for better fuel consumption. Earth Dreams Technology.

800x600_86RSQ6EG527L0008.jpg
 
Haha! I say that cause it front look almost the same but the rear to me like using back the idea of this old accord design and reconstruct it from there. To me la.

Ya new one using SOHC engine also for the 2.0L. 2.4L is somewhat go green engine for better fuel consumption. Earth Dreams Technology.

800x600_86RSQ6EG527L0008.jpg

Haha, you are so right about the picture. Agreed, the front of the new Accord looks nice to me but the rear design seemed to be a bit of a backward step instead.

Now Honda's approach is so different from what they do during the 90s. The emergence of the VTEC era. One thing that I've read about the new Accord is that they still retain the torque converter automatic for a more involving driving experience than going for CVT. I don't know how true is that statement or whether is it just because of costs reasons. :rofl:
 
Haha, you are so right about the picture. Agreed, the front of the new Accord looks nice to me but the rear design seemed to be a bit of a backward step instead.

Now Honda's approach is so different from what they do during the 90s. The emergence of the VTEC era. One thing that I've read about the new Accord is that they still retain the torque converter automatic for a more involving driving experience than going for CVT. I don't know how true is that statement or whether is it just because of costs reasons. :rofl:

Wah...dont go CVT man...just doesn't sound like a right match at all with VTEC behaviour...
Is like the Preve Turbo with CVT already doesn't seems to click.

But they have new tech that seems this accord is more on fuel saving. Seems Honda also
focusing on saving fuel now instead. Earth Dream Tech.
 
they had a rm12-14k rebate on the old accord but VTi model (fabric seats) 2 months ago.
now not sure.
 
they had a rm12-14k rebate on the old accord but VTi model (fabric seats) 2 months ago.
now not sure.

That's a lot. Should be a good buy then. Accord wont be as hot cake as Vios I guess due to the price range is higher.
 
but VTi has no value as its fabric seats compared to VTi-L (leather seats).
VTI-L only a few k's discount.
 
Wah...dont go CVT man...just doesn't sound like a right match at all with VTEC behaviour...
Is like the Preve Turbo with CVT already doesn't seems to click.

But they have new tech that seems this accord is more on fuel saving. Seems Honda also
focusing on saving fuel now instead. Earth Dream Tech.

But their hybrids all use CVT. Jazz, CR-Z and Insight...

CVT is just like a running rubberband. And it's expensive to maintain as well. :banghead:
 
I bought the optra in 2011 for only RM28k. It has been with me for 2 years so far maintenance is no problem. Only the normal wear & tear i.e. replace brake pad, spark plugs, fuel filter, battery, change motor oil & oil filter. I think it is a good buy for used car. However, whoever bought it brand new will curse the car cause it depreciate too much. I already use to owning a 2.0 cars for the past 10 years so the fuel is no problem for me even though it is a bit more compare to Japanese cars.:driver:



---------- Post added at 07:06 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 06:58 PM ----------

before the optra my ride was altis 1.8 year 2007. I like the beige leather seat and interior. Optra's interior also is beige leather seat. So I sold my altis for RM 77k and bought optra for only RM 28k. How much do I have saved and the ride is almost the same. Optra is better at cornering and going through speed bumps.

---------- Post added at 07:14 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 07:06 PM ----------

My rough history of owning a car:
1992 to 1993 Accord 2.0 1989
1994 to 1995 Accord 2.0 1991
1995 t0 1997 Telstar 2.0 1994
1997 to 2000 wira disel 2.0 1997
2000 to 2003 wira vr4 2.0
2003 to 2007 wira 1.8
2007 to 2011 Altis 1.8
2011 to 2013 optra 1.8

Unfortunately you're limiting yourself to just 2.0 cause IMHO D-segment cars like Accord/Camry/Teana/Mazda 6 with 2.0 N/A engines are just hopelessly underpowered. If you're ok with the road tax (almost rm900), you should think about getting 2.5ltr car for this size, then I'd suggest to buy first gen Toyota Mark X (GRX120).

If still just want to stay with 2.0, then IMHO stick with C-segment cars like Altis or Civic, but of course would not be as comfortable as Camry or Accord.
 
Haha! I say that cause it front look almost the same but the rear to me like using back the idea of this old accord design and reconstruct it from there. To me la.

Ya new one using SOHC engine also for the 2.0L. 2.4L is somewhat go green engine for better fuel consumption. Earth Dreams Technology.

800x600_86RSQ6EG527L0008.jpg

Trying to look like Mercedes.....hahaha:biggrin:

---------- Post added at 08:42 AM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 08:31 AM ----------


This one...



Modulo kit

---------- Post added at 08:43 AM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 08:42 AM ----------

But looks like Camry liao....
 
Trying to look like Mercedes.....hahaha:biggrin:

---------- Post added at 08:42 AM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 08:31 AM ----------


This one...



Modulo kit

---------- Post added at 08:43 AM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 08:42 AM ----------

But looks like Camry liao....

It slightly reminds me of the W212 E class as well.

Mercedes-W212-E-Class-FL-38-850x479.jpg
 
So most cars are going towards Toyota design then? :rofl: It does look like camry concept at the rear with the long chrome bar connecting
two tail lights....

http://images.cardekho.com/car-images/carexteriorimages/large/Toyota/new-toyota-camry/toyota-camry-rear-angle-view-048.jpg

Honda-Accord-0024-850x568_zps0596e9bb.jpg
 

Posts refresh every 5 minutes




Search

Online now

Enjoying Zerotohundred?

Log-in for an ad-less experience