Will Izso buy a good car???

  • See what others are reading now! Try Forums > Current Activity
  • Search function more powerful with google results! Try Search

6UE5t

6,000 RPM
Senior Member
Oct 8, 2010
6,756
1,300
1,713
Kuala Lumpur
I don't like the Evo 5/6 hahahaha..

E8 is too "fat". Rounded a lot. 7 is way more edgy.
You don't like E5/6 also just because of the looks? I'm exact opposite, I don't like V7 at all.

You like the edgy look of E7 but you like the very cute rounded looking V7 instead of the much edgier looking E5/6??

Between E7 & 8, for me I prefer 8 not because of the looks but because it has 6 sp and slightly bigger fuel tank, plus the improved AYC. Appearance wise, I also still prefer the 8 just a tad because the rear wing looks more subtle. But E9 exterior is my favorite of all.
 
Last edited:

Mitevo7

1,000 RPM
Senior Member
Jan 14, 2008
1,456
179
3,163
Still searching for the "right one".


I did some research on the E90 generation diesel cars. Parts are super rare in terms of halfcut locally and they aren't cheap new. The petrol variant has a lot more cheaper options. But the good FC and torque is a huge plus for me. I'm still waiting for your friend to respond though.


Maybe I already bought a car and I've just been quietly driving it around without announcing. Hehe.

Anyway I wanna make a video about this whole fiasco. And to teach people not to repeat my mistakes.
BMW E90 ... Ah remembered my days of researching and testing multiple units of this before i settled for my Volvo S60. To tell you my side of story, the only thingi think worth buying in E90 series is the 325i M-Sport, sold in between 2009 to 2012. The N52 6 cyl has so much omph and expected will perform better after remapped. But my source says that only additional 10 bhp were squeezed out from the already well mapped N52. If you can't find a decent 325i, you can try out 323i, same N52 engine without 3 stage intake manifold and less aggressive mapping.

Thanks,
Ken
 

Mitevo7

1,000 RPM
Senior Member
Jan 14, 2008
1,456
179
3,163
You don't like E5/6 also just because of the looks? I'm exact opposite, I don't like V7 at all.

You like the edgy look of E7 but you like the very cute rounded looking V7 instead of the much edgier looking E5/6??

Between E7 & 8, for me I prefer 8 not because of the looks but because it has 6 sp and slightly bigger fuel tank, plus the improved AYC. Appearance wise, I also still prefer the 8 just a tad because the rear wing looks more subtle. But E9 exterior is my favorite of all.
After years of looking at Evolution series, i think the CN - CP series have the best styling throughout the Evolution lifetime. During my younger days, Evo is the "gangster" getaway car, and your peers will worship you like their king if you ever owned one. In Japan, i have seen more CP & CN Lancer Evolution than CT.

In terms of CT series, Evo8 takes the cake, the front diamond crest is so badass to look at, especially from the side.

Thanks,
Ken
 

ixeo

4,000 RPM
Senior Member
Jun 26, 2005
4,788
3,080
5,213
KL, Malaysia
You can la! I'm about to do that and I'm surely way much older than you!
You're hardcore, I'm soft porn :listen:

Damn. I feel ancient
Let me join you.

I did consider a Lotus before, briefly. And being in a cruiseliner now, I have no regrets. For daily driving I want 3Cs, comfort, convenience and chicks. Haven't gotten the last part yet.

After years of looking at Evolution series, i think the CN - CP series have the best styling throughout the Evolution lifetime. During my younger days, Evo is the "gangster" getaway car, and your peers will worship you like their king if you ever owned one. In Japan, i have seen more CP & CN Lancer Evolution than CT.

In terms of CT series, Evo8 takes the cake, the front diamond crest is so badass to look at, especially from the side.

Thanks,
Ken
Interesting view, I have always felt Evo8 was the ugly duckling in the family of the 7, 8 and 9.

The 7 was edgy, sharp angles. 8 was a bit rounded but just looked out of place to me. The 9 was more refined. It felt like the 8 was penned by someone who was not part of the 7.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Izso

Izso

NA NA NA NA NA
Helmet Clan
Moderator
Mar 28, 2004
15,390
6,411
5,213
KL
Will it be difficult to maintain V7? Saw a lot selling... wonder what is the condition.
Nothing is difficult if you have lots of $$$.

NANI!!!! evo 5/6 dabes!
Yeah nah. 7/9 for life.

I think daily driving an Evo or WRX STi will grow tiring for an old fart like me.
Yeah agree. But if the car is anything like the racecar Saga FLX I'm driving now then I could live with it. I would hate it if the clutch is hard.
 

Izso

NA NA NA NA NA
Helmet Clan
Moderator
Mar 28, 2004
15,390
6,411
5,213
KL
You don't like E5/6 also just because of the looks? I'm exact opposite, I don't like V7 at all.

You like the edgy look of E7 but you like the very cute rounded looking V7 instead of the much edgier looking E5/6??

Between E7 & 8, for me I prefer 8 not because of the looks but because it has 6 sp and slightly bigger fuel tank, plus the improved AYC. Appearance wise, I also still prefer the 8 just a tad because the rear wing looks more subtle. But E9 exterior is my favorite of all.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Evo and Subaru round/edgy look is very different. Can't compare the V7 and E7 la.

Damn. I feel ancient
You are. Hahaha

BMW E90 ... Ah remembered my days of researching and testing multiple units of this before i settled for my Volvo S60. To tell you my side of story, the only thingi think worth buying in E90 series is the 325i M-Sport, sold in between 2009 to 2012. The N52 6 cyl has so much omph and expected will perform better after remapped. But my source says that only additional 10 bhp were squeezed out from the already well mapped N52. If you can't find a decent 325i, you can try out 323i, same N52 engine without 3 stage intake manifold and less aggressive mapping.

Thanks,
Ken
Odd.. the 320i I am messing with now has better torque than the 325i I came across. Let's see how it goes.
 

6UE5t

6,000 RPM
Senior Member
Oct 8, 2010
6,756
1,300
1,713
Kuala Lumpur
After years of looking at Evolution series, i think the CN - CP series have the best styling throughout the Evolution lifetime. During my younger days, Evo is the "gangster" getaway car, and your peers will worship you like their king if you ever owned one. In Japan, i have seen more CP & CN Lancer Evolution than CT.

In terms of CT series, Evo8 takes the cake, the front diamond crest is so badass to look at, especially from the side.

Thanks,
Ken
I prefer CT9A body style coz more modern and smoother a bit.
You're hardcore, I'm soft porn :listen:



Let me join you.

I did consider a Lotus before, briefly. And being in a cruiseliner now, I have no regrets. For daily driving I want 3Cs, comfort, convenience and chicks. Haven't gotten the last part yet.



Interesting view, I have always felt Evo8 was the ugly duckling in the family of the 7, 8 and 9.

The 7 was edgy, sharp angles. 8 was a bit rounded but just looked out of place to me. The 9 was more refined. It felt like the 8 was penned by someone who was not part of the 7.
Lotus is hardcore, Evo is soft porn, anything below that is just rated R.

Initially when the 8 came out, I also didn't like it but it grew on me. If add carbon front lip and then it looks much better. Some people even cut out the triangle logo so it looks better and similar to E9. As for the E7, not quite a fan of the wing design but everything else looks nice.
Nothing is difficult if you have lots of $$$.


Yeah nah. 7/9 for life.


Yeah agree. But if the car is anything like the racecar Saga FLX I'm driving now then I could live with it. I would hate it if the clutch is hard.
Evo stock clutch is a bit hard for Japanese car but similar to those old German cars. If replaced with those twin clutch or super single whatever then becomes unbearable. CP9A clutch is a tad lighter though than CT9A.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Izso

Mitevo7

1,000 RPM
Senior Member
Jan 14, 2008
1,456
179
3,163
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Evo and Subaru round/edgy look is very different. Can't compare the V7 and E7 la.


You are. Hahaha


Odd.. the 320i I am messing with now has better torque than the 325i I came across. Let's see how it goes.
Impossible, the 320i was worse than my Lancer 2.0 with CVT and 18" heavy wheels. The 320i i messed with is 17' M sport wheels and its acceleration is boring. The 325i is the perfect executive sedan for personal use but its costly to maintain. The freaking electric water pump is one of them.

Thanks,
Ken
 

Izso

NA NA NA NA NA
Helmet Clan
Moderator
Mar 28, 2004
15,390
6,411
5,213
KL
Impossible, the 320i was worse than my Lancer 2.0 with CVT and 18" heavy wheels. The 320i i messed with is 17' M sport wheels and its acceleration is boring. The 325i is the perfect executive sedan for personal use but its costly to maintain. The freaking electric water pump is one of them.

Thanks,
Ken
Huh.. I've driven a stock standard Lancer 2.0 as well and I didn't like how that drove at all. And the 320i E90 i'm driving around atm has a barge heavy feel and it's the full Msport 2011 LCI 320i car too. I dunno - I prefer the BMW anyday over the Lancer. I'm just not a CVT fan except for the one found in the subaru impreza saloon car. That one doesn't even act like a CVT
 

Mitevo7

1,000 RPM
Senior Member
Jan 14, 2008
1,456
179
3,163
Huh.. I've driven a stock standard Lancer 2.0 as well and I didn't like how that drove at all. And the 320i E90 i'm driving around atm has a barge heavy feel and it's the full Msport 2011 LCI 320i car too. I dunno - I prefer the BMW anyday over the Lancer. I'm just not a CVT fan except for the one found in the subaru impreza saloon car. That one doesn't even act like a CVT
If you talk about response upon take off, the 320i is faster to get off the starting line. Lancer's sluggish CVT is tuned to have slight slip at lower speed and full bite after taking off. It terms of all around acceleration, Lancer is actually slightly faster, especially at rolling speed. My results are slightly inaccurate due to my Lancer's were modified with headers, custom bullet, and TM Works prior to test driving 320i. But i doubt those can make so much difference. DK Tune the car should able to get the CVT works better, however i have no time to put the car over.

I must admit, Subaru's Lineartronic is one of the best CVT out there, may be its due to AWD therefore the acceleration is great.

Thanks,
Ken
 

Izso

NA NA NA NA NA
Helmet Clan
Moderator
Mar 28, 2004
15,390
6,411
5,213
KL
If you talk about response upon take off, the 320i is faster to get off the starting line. Lancer's sluggish CVT is tuned to have slight slip at lower speed and full bite after taking off. It terms of all around acceleration, Lancer is actually slightly faster, especially at rolling speed. My results are slightly inaccurate due to my Lancer's were modified with headers, custom bullet, and TM Works prior to test driving 320i. But i doubt those can make so much difference. DK Tune the car should able to get the CVT works better, however i have no time to put the car over.

I must admit, Subaru's Lineartronic is one of the best CVT out there, may be its due to AWD therefore the acceleration is great.

Thanks,
Ken
Ok that's a lot done to a Lancer that has a supposedly weak CVT GB. haha! Anyway I've been cruising around in the 320 for a few days now and I realize it's not a shouty roaring fire blazing machine, it's more of a waft and cruise whilst feeling like a feather type of machine and I can appreciate that at my age. I'll probably get a lightweight cornering mad-my-butts-on-fire toy car in the distant foreseeable future. Right now I am seriously liking how the e90 drives.
 

Mitevo7

1,000 RPM
Senior Member
Jan 14, 2008
1,456
179
3,163
Ok that's a lot done to a Lancer that has a supposedly weak CVT GB. haha! Anyway I've been cruising around in the 320 for a few days now and I realize it's not a shouty roaring fire blazing machine, it's more of a waft and cruise whilst feeling like a feather type of machine and I can appreciate that at my age. I'll probably get a lightweight cornering mad-my-butts-on-fire toy car in the distant foreseeable future. Right now I am seriously liking how the e90 drives.
The E90 is a great cruiser i must say, if you don't mind higher roadtax and premium, try 323i ? It's still a 6cyl engine, has i-Drive and 17" wheels. Presumably the quality is better than 325 and 320 due to lesser complaint reported. I have tested E90 and E92, 320, 323, 325 variants, only the 320D not able to explore. I can tell, BMW without 6cyl feels lacking.

Thanks,
Ken
 

Izso

NA NA NA NA NA
Helmet Clan
Moderator
Mar 28, 2004
15,390
6,411
5,213
KL
The E90 is a great cruiser i must say, if you don't mind higher roadtax and premium, try 323i ? It's still a 6cyl engine, has i-Drive and 17" wheels. Presumably the quality is better than 325 and 320 due to lesser complaint reported. I have tested E90 and E92, 320, 323, 325 variants, only the 320D not able to explore. I can tell, BMW without 6cyl feels lacking.

Thanks,
Ken
Yeah, you already said the magic key words - roadtax. Haha.. I agree - A bmw without 6 cylinders feels odd
 
Similar threads   Forum
Car Modification
Car Talk
Interior and Cockpit
Exterior and Body
Exterior and Body
Exterior and Body
MAC : Malaysia Airtrek Club
Car Talk
News and Features
News and Features
News and Features
Car Talk
Car Talk
D General Talk
Nissan
Wheel And Tyre
Exterior and Body
The Nissan Fairlady Club
L General Talk
Car Talk
Similar threads  
D
L

Random Post Every 5 Minutes

i brought a kelisa new model which is in orange colour..there is a big different between old model n the new model here.The ecu for old model made from japan and it has 3 socket but my car ecu is from philipina which have only 2 socket head.according to the p2 guy it say this ecu cannot be mod or cant be mod.Is oledi lock from the factory setting no matter how you do.so my question are:

any1 know bour this ecu?
who have install this into their car?
safc2 have 12 ne point compare to sacf1...
Ask a question, start a discussion or post something for sale!
Post thread

Online now

Enjoying Zerotohundred?

Log-in for an ad-less experience