Can 4G93 SOHC win Satria NEO

[kun1006]

my neo 1.6(m) ...im true ...iswara 4g91 bad lah ....*lampu pun tak nak bagi ia nampak* i can do like that...confirm...

---------- Post added at 01:36 AM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 01:16 AM ----------

xtremeleo: u know wat is <handing by lotus> arr??? my neo is <handing by lotus>iswara chassis u know is frm???frm japan rubbish buang in malaysia use in ur car iswara...then iswara is use like sampah chassis...then class also biesa la...wait u buy the better abit car , came here chat lah...sry bro...apoligize!!!

 

[HanZ85]

Yo bro talk like tat no good o u r hitting all the mitsubishi base design proton car leh...

 

[LittleWhiteWagon]

my neo 1.6(m) ...im true ...iswara 4g91 bad lah ....*lampu pun tak nak bagi ia nampak* i can do like that...confirm...

---------- Post added at 01:36 AM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 01:16 AM ----------

xtremeleo: u know wat is <handing by lotus> arr??? my neo is <handing by lotus>iswara chassis u know is frm???frm japan rubbish buang in malaysia use in ur car iswara...then iswara is use like sampah chassis...then class also biesa la...wait u buy the better abit car , came here chat lah...sry bro...apoligize!!!

Oh yes, Lotus means youre the king of FF's in handling right?

Eh you should know that the iswara's rear suspension, semi trailing arms is the same design as E30 bmw's lah, it may be outdated, but the design is still good. Unless you think BMW sucks then I cant convince you haha.

Dont lah start a flame war with that empty head of yours . Lotus tuned suspension = grippy and soft. Its nothing much to boast about...

 

[HanZ85]

Agreeeee.

 

[kun1006]

lotus handing is not handing king...but is very response steering...becoz before i drive civic eg...tat powerful...but conering is no good...i pernah*buang* in sri damansara...then claim insuar...3 month later...i sell the car...then i buy neo...no mod any chassis in my car ...z change the toyo ...i can feel is very nice than the civic fd...i downhill in genting with my friend...tat is vios is sure kalah me...neo is 1.6 ...if powertrain just can fit with 1.6 ...dun want say with abve 2.0...my car maybe can if pickup with n/a 2.0 auto...

 

[LittleWhiteWagon]

Well...

Eg is a decade plus old, bushings old, the suspension also is much softer from a new Neo, and even if you did upgrade the suspension to coilovers/hilo whatever you call it, tires, alignment all play a part in handling.

Im sure the newer Neo will handle better than some Eg's around but consider the fact the Neo is new and the Eg well... old :). Suspension Design, driving style, all also are factors to put into consideration. I just popped in cause you were like saying how 'good' the iswara is. You should go learn about suspension design before making comments on whats good and bad haha, oh and old PORSCHES also used semi-trailing arms like the iswara last time :P. The iswara isnt thaaaat bad, its just the underdog haha.

 

[ham_m2]

aiyo...This topic come out la...
WTH!!!
If want to fight, fight with same hp of car or same cc la...
If u guys want to know,do a test lorh...

 

[boyzone]

Just sharing..

Received my Gen 2 CPS.
Compare with my old junk Mivec, here is my observation :

- Power to weight ratio : Old junk is gain good power to weight ratio as 1.3 Satria chasis is super light !!

- Gear ratio : Mivec gear ratio is drive by 4.592 FD, while Gen2 CPS is set up with 4.302 FD. Have an impressive pick up on 1st and 2nd gear on Mivec, while CPS designed smooth pick up. Therefore, if u are talk about 0-100km/h , 0-400m test, still Mivec take advantages. However, Interm of top speed stability, GEN 2 will smooth mivec easily. ( Don't told me that how good is the suspension u are put in ur wira / Satria, after 160km/h, still floating ).

- Throttle respond : of coz is Mivec as drive by cable. However, new CPS have capable to acheive euro4 emission control as drive by wire.

- Stock set up on chasis : Gen 2 is giving me good impressive on handling and high speed stability. Thanks to the heavy and stiffer chasis design.

-FC : average from my old junk is 18 cent per KM while CPS is offer me with 10 cent per KM.

The conclusion after owned 90s technology engine vs post yr 2000 :

- Pick up : 90s engine will win as no emission control.

- Chasis design: post yr 2000 is focus on safety and stability. While 90s is mainly on power to weight ratio.

- FC : The latest engine u have, a good FC u get.

If u are look for good performance, u have to :

- pay for safety ( light weight chasis )
- pay for high speed stability


If u are look for safety and high speed stability, u have to :

- pay for pick up

If u are look for performance , safety and high speed stability, u have to :

- Look for Euro car like Golf GTI, Clio etc...

 

[arexedehedFaf]

ö, ), à ìÿñî è ðûáó ãîòîâÿò áîëüøèìè êóñêàìè×òîáû áûòü çäîðîâûì, ÷åëîâåêó íóæíî ïðàâèëüíî ïèòàòüñÿ