I don't think wayne need to drive very fast to chase down the guy. I have a same car with him as well as an optra. And I felt lucky for that optra guy because still alive. What will happen if someone mark down the car reg number and revenge later on? ]
You can qualify an action as much as you like, but a 'car chase' is a 'car chase' no matter how differently you want to phrase it. Obviously he feels it is within his right to do something he thinks appropriate.
At the same time, other folks have an equal right to the use of that piece of public road which was turned into a venue of a car chase and a fight. So it's also fair that other people voice their concerns over what has happened.
And if you use a public forum such as ZTH to air your views, you become fair game to all sorts of opinions that come your way, irrespective whether those opinions are good or bad. That is something you need prepare for and to accept if you want to engage in a public forum.
As to whether the Optra guy had been deemed lucky that it was Wayne who dealt with him and not someone else, well...all I can say to that is there are two sides to a coin. It can also be so easily assumed that Wayne might have been the lucky one on that day and at that time for having chased down some guy who is less aggresive. You go into the jungle often enough, you will eventually meet a 'tiger'...or even a pack of them. It could so easily have turned out that he was the one getting the beating instead of the other way round. And if you happen to get one guy who's doped out or who carries a weapon in his vehicle, you might even get more than you bargained for.
Laws, are there to maintain the society peacefulness. But laws have no rights to give permission for people to start up any problem. When a person did something that beyond the culture tolerances, like the optra guy did, he should be automatically unprotected by the laws and responsible for what had he done.What wayne did was technically consider wrong from the book of laws. But his intention of the action did saves all our culture value from being fallen. Also save the laws itself for being disrespected because of protecting something which against the human soul, against the culture, and shameful to the entire human race.
What you think how the law ought to be, is entirely different from how it works.
For one thing, it does not allow someone to beat the crap out of another just on account of a hurtful remark. If the law allowed that kind of retaliation, you'd be in a position to kick the daylights out of anyone just because they happened to be disagreeable to your sensitivities, on whatever issue and subject matter, whether it be on politics, sports, table manners, etc.
Let's not kid ourselves that when the chase was conducted, he had it in his mind to protect culture and country. It was pure and simple an overwhelming desire to clobber that a$$hole in the Optra.
Look, I'm not trying to hang your friend for what he has done. What's done, is done and thankfully things turned out OK for him at the end.
All I'm telling you is this .....and maybe in the process some of you can wise up a little the next time you think of pulling a similar stunt. If it had been me in the Optra, and you assaulted me the way you did, if I had been in a position to defend myself, I could have ended up killing you in self-defence and a court in all likelihood would still have ruled it as justifiable. I could also have easily put you down on charges and then sue your for hundreds of thousands on aggravated assault, mental trauma, loss of livelihood etc. On severe cases, compensation running to millions can be claimed. The way the legal process works is that it allows these claims. You just have to make a good case of it and it won't be hard in a situation such as the one we are considering here. Like I said, if you doubt what I'm saying, just check with a competent lawyer and see whether I'm just blowing sunshine.
I'm not saying I'm proud of him, but if a thief fell down from a house then injured, and he is entitle to sue the house owner for not maintaining the house properly, I think it will be most shameful and darkest day for the entire country.
If you are not legally inclined.....and I'm assuming you are not......, then you should not make assumptions about operation of law that has no prior legal precedents. You cannot sue the owner of a premises if you get injured at his premises whilst you were robbing it. That would be unheard of in any court of law because it is tantamount to a court giving due protection to individuals during the course of committing unlawful acts.
And while you brought out that remark, it will also highlight why your friend will similarly not be protected if he assaulted the Optra driver. Your friend cannot tell the court that he assaulted on account of hurtful remarks because assault in itself is unlawful. If it is lawful then it won't be called 'assault'. It will be referred to as 'self-defence'. In your friend's case, it's not self-defence.