Reply to thread

See what others are reading now! Try Forums > Current Activity

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FVel" data-source="post: 1063482160" data-attributes="member: 48425">csl,I’m not even going to bother replying your points. All your suggestions are based on fantasy. It has no technical basis. Just complete utter garbage. I don’t want to spend any more time than necessary engaging in discussions with no-clue nitwits with an over-developed sense of grandeur. To think that some of us here actually had experience dealing with radiation issues on a regular basis and understood more than most people on the subject, it is nevertheless insulting that we are still being second-guessed by half-wits like you and accused of being narrow-minded with an attitude problem. Personally, I think the one with the worst attitude here is you.A few posts earlier, you are the one forcing the discussion towards technical issues when you questioned why we did not discuss SCRAM.Obviously, after being made to look foolish by me for not understanding SCRAM and its association with the coolant systems, you now decide to change your tune and accuse us of being technical. csl, you are a fraud. You cannot even engage in discussions in a fair manner. When things are not going your way, you decide to move the goalposts and stack the deck in your favor.Basically, you cannot accept when people disagree with you, irrespective of how considered their opinions may be. For example, you had a meltdown a few posts earlier when Mizunori debated with facts against you. Like I said, you are self-important and narcissistic. You have virtually no clue on the technical aspects but still that did not stop you from suggesting engineering solutions. How does a guy who does not even understand how a reactor work actually have so much arrogance to suggest engineering solutions for nuclear reactors and, at the same time, accuse the collective community for being lazy, having a negative attitude and not doing all the research ?? Oh, by the way, when you drew up your picture on how to build infrastructure for a reactor, that is ‘technical’ despite your earlier suggestion of ‘displeasure’ for anything of that sort……not that you notice when it suits you. When it does not suit you, you accuse me of being too technical. Gee…… You really are dumbAs usual ? LOL...As usual you write a lot of science fiction and people here are not getting educated in any substantive way by your ramblings. Please get a hold of yourself. You are not that smart, even if you think so. By the way, what does 'csl' really stand for ? "Crap by the Shit Loads " ?---------- Post added at 12:03 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 11:42 AM ----------Hi Richard,There's a minimum size to what is feasible to power a national grid compared to powering a nuclear sub.Two very different considerations and two very different power requirements. Submarine reactors are rated at hundreds of megawatts whereas power utility reactors are well over thousands of megawatts.I cannot confirm Veloc's numbers on the costs of commissioning but it does not sound unreasonable. Reactors, and their infrastructure and support, even the smaller ones are very expensive. There is also the question whether a total national population of only 28 million have a really dire need for nuclear power. For one thing, it won't solve the oil dependency issue. For another nuclear power has always been supplemental to more conventional means of power generation. It has not replaced conventional power even in nations that employ nuclear power.Another point is, nations with nuclear power are, by and large, heavily industrialized with heavy population vis-a-vis the rest of the world. Their needs for power probably justify the path towards nukes to supplement the power equation. Malaysia is just 28 million heads and not particularly industrialized.</blockquote>

Verification

The Marketplace Latest

original rare Rays Volk Racing CE28 16x7jj offset...
- Started by david tao
- Chassis and Wheels
Honda Jazz/Fit JSracing GTwing Spoiler
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body
Toyota Vios NCP93 front bonnet hood
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body
Honda civic fc varis spoiler
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body
BMW F10 Msport front bumper set
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body
BMW F30 M3/GTS front bonnet hood
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body
BMW F10 vorsteiner rear bumper diffuser
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo bodykit
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body
BMW F30 M3 front skirt lip
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body
Honda Civic FC fk7si front bumper set
- Started by jeff6126
- Exterior and Body

Posts refresh every 5 minutes

Caltex is 75 years young with a new image

In order to give a new dimension to the esteemed brand Caltex and boost the commercial prospects of Chevron- one of...

fto mivec 6a12 ecu

anyone who know the ecu code for fto mivec 6a12 4a/t ???
pls help urgent!

GTR wannabe

you can see a lot of Skyline GTS trying to convert GTR look
wide front body and wide rear arch

a lot of them fail miserable or cannot make it

but i proudly declare i succesful doing it
those people please dont be...