This 1 is base on my personal experience on self personal test drive on self test course and personal experiencing. Just hope can be a guide line for you all to choose the car!
National car:
Category 1000cc and below:
Perodua Kancil:
Comfortable - 4/20 (heavy cabin noise at any sort of speed undoes all the good work)
Performance - 3/20 (lack of power, just enough to use if at city, FC - around RM 0.08 per km)
Handling - 4/20 (still can acceptable in compact category)
Design - 2/20 (design very out dated, unless equip with Mira body part)
Interior - 4/20 (too much of cheap plastic smell, stupid design speedometer)
Perodua Kelisa:
Comfortable - 4/20 (heavy cabin noise at any sort of speed undoes all the good work)
Performance - 7/20 (adequate urban progress but the whole thing comes unstuck at motorway speeds, FC - around RM 0.11 per km)
Handling - 4/20 (still can acceptable in compact category)
Design - 6/20 (design very out dated, unless equip with L7 body part)
Interior - 5/20 (too much of cheap plastic smell, dashboard feel like wira dashboard)
Perodua Kenari:
Comfortable - 4/20 (rides reasonably well, but there's way too much wind noise)
Performance - 7/20 (adequate urban progress but the whole thing comes unstuck at motorway speeds, FC - around RM 0.11 per km)
Handling - 2/20 (short wheelbase and ponderously high roofline, means it can't cornering in good)
Design - 7/20 (not bad to said)
Interior - 6/20 (too much of cheap plastic smell, speedometer design not bad)
Perodua Viva:
Comfortable - 4/20 (rides reasonably well, but there's way too much wind noise)
Performance - 9/20 (850cc and 1000cc are adequate urban progress, but 660 slightly underpower) FC - around RM 0.13 per km, but viva 1.0 FC are around RM 0.10 per km only
Handling - 4/20 (short wheelbase and ponderously high roofline, means it can't cornering in good)
Design - 9/20 (cool... it look alike Avanza)
Interior - 3/20 (too much of cheap plastic smell, stupid speedometer design, stupid CD player position)
Category 1001 cc - 1300 cc
Proton Savvy:
Comfortable - 7/20 (rides reasonably well, but there's way too much engine noise and tire noise; Have feeling like driving on big car; rear head room not enough)
Performance - 7/20 (Power was just enough no more and no less, but not on high rpm;had very good FC) FC are around RM 0.10 per km only
Handling - 11/20 (very good handling, special thanks to Lotus which help a lot in the handling)
Design - 9/20 (cool... but at front; but this car got 2 face, front and rear slightly got same design)
Interior - 7/20 (nice speedometer design and dashboard design, but still alot of plastic smell)
Proton Saga BLM:
Comfortable - 9/20 (rides reasonably well, but there's way too much tire noise; Have feeling like driving on big car)
Performance - 12/20 (light body weight and Campro which help the Saga BLM to achieve best engine performance in this category; but FC slightly high) FC are around RM 0.16 per km only
Handling - 11/20 (very good handling, special thanks to Lotus which help a lot in the handling)
Design - 13/20 (cool... at rear slightly look alike Latio Sedan)
Interior - 7/20 (nice speedometer design and dashboard design, but still alot of plastic smell; Power steering slightly heavy)
Perodua MyVi:
Comfortable - 10/20 (rides reasonably well, but slightly bumpy)
Performance - 10/20 (thanks to Toyota provide a decent DVVT engine, it help alot in performance) FC are around RM 0.12 per km only
Handling - 8/20 (short wheelbase and ponderously high roofline, means it can't cornering in good)
Design - 13/20 (cool... today's modern car)
Interior - 10/20 (nice speedometer design and dashboard design, but still alot of plastic smell)
Perodua Kembara:
Comfortable - 4/20 (bumpy!)
Performance - 3/20 (No power, can't produce normal 4x4 performance can be! high FC!) FC are around RM 0.20 per km only
Handling - 5/20 (short wheelbase and ponderously high roofline, means it can't cornering in good)
Design - 6/20 (no comment, but still can acceptable design)
Interior - 4/20 (alot of plastic smell)
Category 1301 cc - 1600 cc
Proton Personal:
Comfortable - 12/20 (rides reasonably well, but suspension slightly hard abit; rear seat not comfortable (Cushion too low) )
Performance - 11/20 (easy to maintained speed at 120kmj-1; but accelerate slightly slow) FC are around RM 0.18 per km
Handling - 9/20 (does better than you'd expect, with plenty of grip and very little body roll but rear boot are slightly heavy)
Design - 6/20 (rear design not nice, boot too long; front headlamp was conflict with signal lamp)
Interior - 12/20 (nice speedometer design, dashboard design, and door trim design but still alot of plastic smell)
Proton Gen 2
Comfortable - 12/20 (rides reasonably well, but suspension slightly hard abit; rear seat not comfortable (rear roof was too low) )
Performance - 11/20 (easy to maintained speed at 120kmj-1; but accelerate slightly slow) IAFM model FC are around RM 0.18 per km, CPS model FC are around RM 0.19 per km.
Handling - 11/20 (does better than you'd expect, with plenty of grip and very little body roll)
Design - 8/20 (front headlamp was conflict with signal lamp; sporty look if equip with body kits)
Interior - 10/20 (nice speedometer design, dashboard design, and door trim design but still alot of plastic smell, and interior color not nice)
Proton Satria Neo
Comfortable - 12/20 (rides reasonably well, but suspension slightly hard abit; front roofline was too low, so will not comfortable for tall people especially when want to use the sun shade)
Performance - 12/20 (lightweight and easy to maintained speed at 120kmj-1) IAFM model FC are around RM 0.17 per km, CPS model FC are around RM 0.18 per km.
Handling - 12/20 (handles well, with sharp steering, plenty of grip from those driven front wheels and nicely controlled body roll.)
Design - 12/20 (Overall exterior was nice and cool!)
Interior - 11/20 (nice speedometer design, dashboard design, and door trim design but still alot of plastic smell)
Please don't reply yet... I will continue it with some Japaness car review and European car review by tonight.
---------- Post added at 10:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:12 AM ----------
- reserve -
National car:
Category 1000cc and below:
Perodua Kancil:
Comfortable - 4/20 (heavy cabin noise at any sort of speed undoes all the good work)
Performance - 3/20 (lack of power, just enough to use if at city, FC - around RM 0.08 per km)
Handling - 4/20 (still can acceptable in compact category)
Design - 2/20 (design very out dated, unless equip with Mira body part)
Interior - 4/20 (too much of cheap plastic smell, stupid design speedometer)
Perodua Kelisa:
Comfortable - 4/20 (heavy cabin noise at any sort of speed undoes all the good work)
Performance - 7/20 (adequate urban progress but the whole thing comes unstuck at motorway speeds, FC - around RM 0.11 per km)
Handling - 4/20 (still can acceptable in compact category)
Design - 6/20 (design very out dated, unless equip with L7 body part)
Interior - 5/20 (too much of cheap plastic smell, dashboard feel like wira dashboard)
Perodua Kenari:
Comfortable - 4/20 (rides reasonably well, but there's way too much wind noise)
Performance - 7/20 (adequate urban progress but the whole thing comes unstuck at motorway speeds, FC - around RM 0.11 per km)
Handling - 2/20 (short wheelbase and ponderously high roofline, means it can't cornering in good)
Design - 7/20 (not bad to said)
Interior - 6/20 (too much of cheap plastic smell, speedometer design not bad)
Perodua Viva:
Comfortable - 4/20 (rides reasonably well, but there's way too much wind noise)
Performance - 9/20 (850cc and 1000cc are adequate urban progress, but 660 slightly underpower) FC - around RM 0.13 per km, but viva 1.0 FC are around RM 0.10 per km only
Handling - 4/20 (short wheelbase and ponderously high roofline, means it can't cornering in good)
Design - 9/20 (cool... it look alike Avanza)
Interior - 3/20 (too much of cheap plastic smell, stupid speedometer design, stupid CD player position)
Category 1001 cc - 1300 cc
Proton Savvy:
Comfortable - 7/20 (rides reasonably well, but there's way too much engine noise and tire noise; Have feeling like driving on big car; rear head room not enough)
Performance - 7/20 (Power was just enough no more and no less, but not on high rpm;had very good FC) FC are around RM 0.10 per km only
Handling - 11/20 (very good handling, special thanks to Lotus which help a lot in the handling)
Design - 9/20 (cool... but at front; but this car got 2 face, front and rear slightly got same design)
Interior - 7/20 (nice speedometer design and dashboard design, but still alot of plastic smell)
Proton Saga BLM:
Comfortable - 9/20 (rides reasonably well, but there's way too much tire noise; Have feeling like driving on big car)
Performance - 12/20 (light body weight and Campro which help the Saga BLM to achieve best engine performance in this category; but FC slightly high) FC are around RM 0.16 per km only
Handling - 11/20 (very good handling, special thanks to Lotus which help a lot in the handling)
Design - 13/20 (cool... at rear slightly look alike Latio Sedan)
Interior - 7/20 (nice speedometer design and dashboard design, but still alot of plastic smell; Power steering slightly heavy)
Perodua MyVi:
Comfortable - 10/20 (rides reasonably well, but slightly bumpy)
Performance - 10/20 (thanks to Toyota provide a decent DVVT engine, it help alot in performance) FC are around RM 0.12 per km only
Handling - 8/20 (short wheelbase and ponderously high roofline, means it can't cornering in good)
Design - 13/20 (cool... today's modern car)
Interior - 10/20 (nice speedometer design and dashboard design, but still alot of plastic smell)
Perodua Kembara:
Comfortable - 4/20 (bumpy!)
Performance - 3/20 (No power, can't produce normal 4x4 performance can be! high FC!) FC are around RM 0.20 per km only
Handling - 5/20 (short wheelbase and ponderously high roofline, means it can't cornering in good)
Design - 6/20 (no comment, but still can acceptable design)
Interior - 4/20 (alot of plastic smell)
Category 1301 cc - 1600 cc
Proton Personal:
Comfortable - 12/20 (rides reasonably well, but suspension slightly hard abit; rear seat not comfortable (Cushion too low) )
Performance - 11/20 (easy to maintained speed at 120kmj-1; but accelerate slightly slow) FC are around RM 0.18 per km
Handling - 9/20 (does better than you'd expect, with plenty of grip and very little body roll but rear boot are slightly heavy)
Design - 6/20 (rear design not nice, boot too long; front headlamp was conflict with signal lamp)
Interior - 12/20 (nice speedometer design, dashboard design, and door trim design but still alot of plastic smell)
Proton Gen 2
Comfortable - 12/20 (rides reasonably well, but suspension slightly hard abit; rear seat not comfortable (rear roof was too low) )
Performance - 11/20 (easy to maintained speed at 120kmj-1; but accelerate slightly slow) IAFM model FC are around RM 0.18 per km, CPS model FC are around RM 0.19 per km.
Handling - 11/20 (does better than you'd expect, with plenty of grip and very little body roll)
Design - 8/20 (front headlamp was conflict with signal lamp; sporty look if equip with body kits)
Interior - 10/20 (nice speedometer design, dashboard design, and door trim design but still alot of plastic smell, and interior color not nice)
Proton Satria Neo
Comfortable - 12/20 (rides reasonably well, but suspension slightly hard abit; front roofline was too low, so will not comfortable for tall people especially when want to use the sun shade)
Performance - 12/20 (lightweight and easy to maintained speed at 120kmj-1) IAFM model FC are around RM 0.17 per km, CPS model FC are around RM 0.18 per km.
Handling - 12/20 (handles well, with sharp steering, plenty of grip from those driven front wheels and nicely controlled body roll.)
Design - 12/20 (Overall exterior was nice and cool!)
Interior - 11/20 (nice speedometer design, dashboard design, and door trim design but still alot of plastic smell)
Please don't reply yet... I will continue it with some Japaness car review and European car review by tonight.
---------- Post added at 10:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:12 AM ----------
- reserve -
Last edited: