Double wishbone and macpherson strut both has pro and cons. But on handlingwise, double wishbone is superior due to its higher camber gain. A straight forward definition of Camber gain is: increasing dynamic camber with respect to suspension travel in compression (how much camber is achieved as the car rolls). The value of camber gains are different from one car to another. In average, double wishbone camber gain is twice that of macpherson strut. So, thats why ef, ek, eg, dc2, etc can be lowered and still good in cornering.
Try lower a macpherson strut cars like dc5, waja, gen-2, satria, satria neo, etc without setting back the roll centre & bumpsteer and you'll feel the handling is not up to standard.
Being able to have higher camber gain means you do not need to set your static camber much, as the suspension linkage will make your car to have more camber dynamically.
Thats why you see track car which uses macpherson strut, usually their camber is set very2 negatively high. This is because macpherson strut cars have low camber gain. So, they counter it by putting more static camber.
) when cornering definately will result to a painful result. It can oversteer at the lease expected turns. 
ko suke ah ade geng 
