This is posted in another forums but I am sure everyone is interested to know what's the "shit contribution" of the police to our country!!! 
The RM34 million cop
A retired police officer alleged that corruption was rampant within the police force (PDRM). He claimed that many officers has assets several times over their known income. According to the complainant, it was common knowledge that a particular senior officer made an asset declaration amounting to RM 34 million and he was surprised that no action was seen to have been taken.
‘Love bites’ from GROs
Two complainants informed the commission that while being detained in a police lockup they witnessed seven guest relations officers (GRO) from China in the next cell being taken out of the police station by police personnel late at night. In the early hours of the morning they were brought back to the police station with ‘love-bites’ on their necks. The prettier ones were taken out more than once.
These GROs were given special privileges such as being allowed to smoke in their cell and given towels to use during their detention. This case was reported to IGP (inspector-general of police) who sent an investigation team from Bukit Aman but the team could not find any record of these GROs being detained in the said police station.
Monthly collection from illegals
The Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) in Penang arrested three police officers for taking bribes and monthly collection from owners of illegal factories (RM350 per month) and employers of illegal immigrants (RM800 per month). The three officers acted as agents or collectors for the said police station.
ACA investigations revealed that the monthly collection amounting to RM2,000 was organised by the OCS (officer-in-charge of station) and there was even an account book to keep track of the money received. All the staff of this said station were transferred out of PDRM. However, according to ACA, no court action could be taken against them because the informant refused to testify in open court.
Free food from five-star hotels
The public also reported to the commission that they had witnessed food from expensive hotels being delivered to their superior officers, on a regular basis, but they could not take any action.
RM40,000 ‘promotion fees’
A complainant came to the commission to make a complaint on behalf of his younger brother who is a police superintendent to the effect that his brother had complained to Bukit Aman about not being promoted. Some time after that the complainant received a call from a stranger to say that he can help the younger brother to get his promotion if he were to pay RM40,000.
Cops bribing cops
A rank-and-file officer on receiving an order to transfer to Peninsular Malaysia from Sarawak appealed through a senior officer in the Service Division. He alleged that the said officer stated that he could nullify the transfer order if a payment was made. The rank-and-file officer agreed to pay RM3,000. At the same time the rank-and-file officer informed ACA of this transaction. Subsequently a sting operation was set up. The senior officer was caught red-handed with the money and was later charged and convicted in the court of law. He was later dismissed from PDRM due to his conviction.
‘Gold mine’ divisions
A complainant informed the commission that a posting to D7 (Anti-Vice, Gaming and Secret Societies Division) will cost RM30,000-RM40,000. The complainant also said that the traffic division is a lucrative branch.
RM25,000 for police transfer
A complainant reported that two senior officers were ordered to go on transfer to Peninsular Malaysia. They declared to their friends that they would be back. Within three months they were back in Sarawak and they claimed that it took them only RM25,000 to effect their return.
Massage girl for investigation officer
A buyer purchased three computers from a computer vendor. As the buyer could not pay for the purchase of these computers, the buyer asked the vendor to take them back. The vendor did what he was asked to do. Subsequently, the buyer lodged a false police report to the effect that the vendor had stolen the three computers from his office. Based on the false report, the vendor was arrested.
Despite documentary evidence produced by the vendor that the buyer was the one who asked him to take back the computers because he could not pay for them, the vendor was detained by the police for allegedly stealing the three computers from the office of the buyer. The vendor had furnished documentary evidence such as e-mail correspondence and the receipts for the computers to the police as proof that it was the buyer who has asked the vendor to pick up the computers.
In spite of this, the vendor was kept in the lock-up for two days without any investigation being carried out. Upon the vendor’s release, he lodged a police report accusing the buyer of lodging a false report of theft against him. However the police took no action to investigate into his report.
When he enquired from the IO (investigating officer) as to when his three computers could be released to him, he was told that they were with the SIO (senior investigating officer) and that he should contact the SIO for them to be returned. When he contacted the SIO, the latter suggested that they meet at a hotel to discuss the matter.
At the meeting, the SIO suggested that the vendor book a room and massage girl for him. This was done and he had to pay for the cost. When he enquired as to when he could pick up the computers, the SIO suggested that he should give him a share of his business. The vendor then decided to come before the commission. The vendor believed that the police had been bribed by the buyer as an act of revenge. Therefore he believed that he had been illegally detained by the police. Following the commission’s intercession, the computers were returned to him.
Fund-raising for police concert
Three complainants reported to the commission that they were detained at a police station after their urine was tested positive for dangerous drugs. In order to be granted bail they were asked to purchase tickets valued at RM200 each for a police concert organised to raise funds for the Police Welfare Fund.
Payment for lockup services
A complainant related his experience in a police lock up where he and two friends were not properly fed and he was told that the police could get food from outside for him at a cost. He was charged RM300 for three teh tarik, roti canai and mee mamak he requested for. He also witnessed the same police personnel demanding RM100 from another detainee for a phone call.
Police harassment
A complainant who owned a car on hire-purchase was unable to pay the monthly instalments and had handed the car to a friend for him to sell the car on his behalf. One night, while his friend was driving the car with him and another friend inside, they were stopped by the police and accused of driving a car that had been used in the commission of a crime. They were arrested and detained at Jelapang Police Station.
They alleged that the police demanded RM1,000 for their release. The next day when they were brought to the Magistrate’s Court, the magistrate ordered their release. Even after their release, the police kept harassing them for the payment of RM1,000.
Bribe to ‘slow down’ probe
A complainant who worked in a company in Butterworth, Penang reported to the commission that he discovered a large amount of money missing from the account of the said company. He brought this matter to the attention of the management and later lodged a police report. A few weeks later, he was attacked and slashed by two men using samurai swords in his apartment’s lift. He sustained serious bodily injuries and was hospitalised for almost three months.
The police recorded his statement and he gave detailed descriptions of the two attackers but the police failed to trace and arrest the two men. He alleged that the management of the said company had influenced certain police officers to delay the investigation into his case. The complainant soon left the country to work overseas because he said it is not safe to work in Malaysia.
Monthly RM200,000 ‘protection money’
In 2002, the ACA investigated into the financial affairs of a senior ranking police officer in Selangor for collecting ‘protection money’ amounting to RM200,000 per month from owners of various illegal premises such as vice dens and also from operators of slot machines and illegal gambling outlets. He owns several houses, shop lots, luxury vehicles and shares. His accumulated wealth is estimated to be about RM 7.4 million. The ACA is still investigating the case.
Hanging out with shady characters
A complainant informed the commission that a certain police officer was frequently seen in the company of shady characters who run vice and gambling dens, prostitution rings and gang-related organised crime. The complainant said that during the last Hari Raya open house held by the said police officer, these characters were seen seated at the VIP table. The complainant also alleged that the police officer is living beyond his means. He lives in a palatial bungalow with a swimming pool and drives luxury cars.
Mini-casino near police station
On Feb 8, 2004, the police raided premises used for a mini-casino in Kuala Langat, Selangor. Thirty-one men and nine women were arrested on the premises. Gambling equipment for Roulette and Baccarat together with chips worth RM2,134,930 were seized. A sum of RM24,481 was also seized from one of the arrested persons.
Disciplinary action was taken against the OCPD, deputy OCPD, CID chief of Kuala Langat and OCS Banting for failure to detect the casino and to take the necessary action. Both the OCPD and Deputy OCPD were transferred with warning letters issued to them. The CID chief of Kuala Langat and the OCS of Banting were fined a day’s emolument and transferred out.
Prostitution ring in Sri Damansara
A prostitution ring was found to be flourishing in a hotel in Sri Damansara, Selangor. Eleven foreign Chinese girls and five men were arrested when a raid was carried out on the premises. Disciplinary action was taken on 21 police personnel and another four supervisory officers and 23 other police personnel attached to the Sri Damansara Police Station, Sungai Buloh between Dec 1, 2003 and Feb 29, 2004.
These police personnel were charged for abuse of power, corruption and non-accountability. Seven detectives who were involved in this case had their detective status revoked. The others had warning letters issued to them. Many of these police personnel were transferred to PGA.
In the service of tow truck operators
Many complaints were received during the inquiry sessions from the public accusing the police of working closely with tow truck companies. Many said that even before the police could arrive at the scene of the accident, the tow trucks were already there. Police personnel were said to be receiving payments for referring business to towing companies, workshops, private hospitals with ambulance services and lawyers.
A complainant met with an accident at a traffic light intersection. A tow truck arrived at the scene of the accident and offered to tow the complainant’s car to the workshop for RM150 even though the distance was very short. When asked why it was so expensive, the complainant was told that a proportion of the payment would have to be given to the police. The complainant also said that he had to pay the police to go to the workshop to take a picture of his damaged car.
‘Toll’ collection in Karak Highway
On Oct 6, 2004, the IGP despatched a team from Bukit Aman to Karak Highway after receiving a tip-off from a motorist. The entire traffic patrol unit headed by a chief inspector was nabbed for demanding bribes from motorists along Karak Highway where these policemen were conducting an operation. Senior officers from Bukit Aman arrested the 11 traffic policemen from the unit who had since been suspended pending investigations into the case.
The RM34 million cop
A retired police officer alleged that corruption was rampant within the police force (PDRM). He claimed that many officers has assets several times over their known income. According to the complainant, it was common knowledge that a particular senior officer made an asset declaration amounting to RM 34 million and he was surprised that no action was seen to have been taken.
‘Love bites’ from GROs
Two complainants informed the commission that while being detained in a police lockup they witnessed seven guest relations officers (GRO) from China in the next cell being taken out of the police station by police personnel late at night. In the early hours of the morning they were brought back to the police station with ‘love-bites’ on their necks. The prettier ones were taken out more than once.
These GROs were given special privileges such as being allowed to smoke in their cell and given towels to use during their detention. This case was reported to IGP (inspector-general of police) who sent an investigation team from Bukit Aman but the team could not find any record of these GROs being detained in the said police station.
Monthly collection from illegals
The Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) in Penang arrested three police officers for taking bribes and monthly collection from owners of illegal factories (RM350 per month) and employers of illegal immigrants (RM800 per month). The three officers acted as agents or collectors for the said police station.
ACA investigations revealed that the monthly collection amounting to RM2,000 was organised by the OCS (officer-in-charge of station) and there was even an account book to keep track of the money received. All the staff of this said station were transferred out of PDRM. However, according to ACA, no court action could be taken against them because the informant refused to testify in open court.
Free food from five-star hotels
The public also reported to the commission that they had witnessed food from expensive hotels being delivered to their superior officers, on a regular basis, but they could not take any action.
RM40,000 ‘promotion fees’
A complainant came to the commission to make a complaint on behalf of his younger brother who is a police superintendent to the effect that his brother had complained to Bukit Aman about not being promoted. Some time after that the complainant received a call from a stranger to say that he can help the younger brother to get his promotion if he were to pay RM40,000.
Cops bribing cops
A rank-and-file officer on receiving an order to transfer to Peninsular Malaysia from Sarawak appealed through a senior officer in the Service Division. He alleged that the said officer stated that he could nullify the transfer order if a payment was made. The rank-and-file officer agreed to pay RM3,000. At the same time the rank-and-file officer informed ACA of this transaction. Subsequently a sting operation was set up. The senior officer was caught red-handed with the money and was later charged and convicted in the court of law. He was later dismissed from PDRM due to his conviction.
‘Gold mine’ divisions
A complainant informed the commission that a posting to D7 (Anti-Vice, Gaming and Secret Societies Division) will cost RM30,000-RM40,000. The complainant also said that the traffic division is a lucrative branch.
RM25,000 for police transfer
A complainant reported that two senior officers were ordered to go on transfer to Peninsular Malaysia. They declared to their friends that they would be back. Within three months they were back in Sarawak and they claimed that it took them only RM25,000 to effect their return.
Massage girl for investigation officer
A buyer purchased three computers from a computer vendor. As the buyer could not pay for the purchase of these computers, the buyer asked the vendor to take them back. The vendor did what he was asked to do. Subsequently, the buyer lodged a false police report to the effect that the vendor had stolen the three computers from his office. Based on the false report, the vendor was arrested.
Despite documentary evidence produced by the vendor that the buyer was the one who asked him to take back the computers because he could not pay for them, the vendor was detained by the police for allegedly stealing the three computers from the office of the buyer. The vendor had furnished documentary evidence such as e-mail correspondence and the receipts for the computers to the police as proof that it was the buyer who has asked the vendor to pick up the computers.
In spite of this, the vendor was kept in the lock-up for two days without any investigation being carried out. Upon the vendor’s release, he lodged a police report accusing the buyer of lodging a false report of theft against him. However the police took no action to investigate into his report.
When he enquired from the IO (investigating officer) as to when his three computers could be released to him, he was told that they were with the SIO (senior investigating officer) and that he should contact the SIO for them to be returned. When he contacted the SIO, the latter suggested that they meet at a hotel to discuss the matter.
At the meeting, the SIO suggested that the vendor book a room and massage girl for him. This was done and he had to pay for the cost. When he enquired as to when he could pick up the computers, the SIO suggested that he should give him a share of his business. The vendor then decided to come before the commission. The vendor believed that the police had been bribed by the buyer as an act of revenge. Therefore he believed that he had been illegally detained by the police. Following the commission’s intercession, the computers were returned to him.
Fund-raising for police concert
Three complainants reported to the commission that they were detained at a police station after their urine was tested positive for dangerous drugs. In order to be granted bail they were asked to purchase tickets valued at RM200 each for a police concert organised to raise funds for the Police Welfare Fund.
Payment for lockup services
A complainant related his experience in a police lock up where he and two friends were not properly fed and he was told that the police could get food from outside for him at a cost. He was charged RM300 for three teh tarik, roti canai and mee mamak he requested for. He also witnessed the same police personnel demanding RM100 from another detainee for a phone call.
Police harassment
A complainant who owned a car on hire-purchase was unable to pay the monthly instalments and had handed the car to a friend for him to sell the car on his behalf. One night, while his friend was driving the car with him and another friend inside, they were stopped by the police and accused of driving a car that had been used in the commission of a crime. They were arrested and detained at Jelapang Police Station.
They alleged that the police demanded RM1,000 for their release. The next day when they were brought to the Magistrate’s Court, the magistrate ordered their release. Even after their release, the police kept harassing them for the payment of RM1,000.
Bribe to ‘slow down’ probe
A complainant who worked in a company in Butterworth, Penang reported to the commission that he discovered a large amount of money missing from the account of the said company. He brought this matter to the attention of the management and later lodged a police report. A few weeks later, he was attacked and slashed by two men using samurai swords in his apartment’s lift. He sustained serious bodily injuries and was hospitalised for almost three months.
The police recorded his statement and he gave detailed descriptions of the two attackers but the police failed to trace and arrest the two men. He alleged that the management of the said company had influenced certain police officers to delay the investigation into his case. The complainant soon left the country to work overseas because he said it is not safe to work in Malaysia.
Monthly RM200,000 ‘protection money’
In 2002, the ACA investigated into the financial affairs of a senior ranking police officer in Selangor for collecting ‘protection money’ amounting to RM200,000 per month from owners of various illegal premises such as vice dens and also from operators of slot machines and illegal gambling outlets. He owns several houses, shop lots, luxury vehicles and shares. His accumulated wealth is estimated to be about RM 7.4 million. The ACA is still investigating the case.
Hanging out with shady characters
A complainant informed the commission that a certain police officer was frequently seen in the company of shady characters who run vice and gambling dens, prostitution rings and gang-related organised crime. The complainant said that during the last Hari Raya open house held by the said police officer, these characters were seen seated at the VIP table. The complainant also alleged that the police officer is living beyond his means. He lives in a palatial bungalow with a swimming pool and drives luxury cars.
Mini-casino near police station
On Feb 8, 2004, the police raided premises used for a mini-casino in Kuala Langat, Selangor. Thirty-one men and nine women were arrested on the premises. Gambling equipment for Roulette and Baccarat together with chips worth RM2,134,930 were seized. A sum of RM24,481 was also seized from one of the arrested persons.
Disciplinary action was taken against the OCPD, deputy OCPD, CID chief of Kuala Langat and OCS Banting for failure to detect the casino and to take the necessary action. Both the OCPD and Deputy OCPD were transferred with warning letters issued to them. The CID chief of Kuala Langat and the OCS of Banting were fined a day’s emolument and transferred out.
Prostitution ring in Sri Damansara
A prostitution ring was found to be flourishing in a hotel in Sri Damansara, Selangor. Eleven foreign Chinese girls and five men were arrested when a raid was carried out on the premises. Disciplinary action was taken on 21 police personnel and another four supervisory officers and 23 other police personnel attached to the Sri Damansara Police Station, Sungai Buloh between Dec 1, 2003 and Feb 29, 2004.
These police personnel were charged for abuse of power, corruption and non-accountability. Seven detectives who were involved in this case had their detective status revoked. The others had warning letters issued to them. Many of these police personnel were transferred to PGA.
In the service of tow truck operators
Many complaints were received during the inquiry sessions from the public accusing the police of working closely with tow truck companies. Many said that even before the police could arrive at the scene of the accident, the tow trucks were already there. Police personnel were said to be receiving payments for referring business to towing companies, workshops, private hospitals with ambulance services and lawyers.
A complainant met with an accident at a traffic light intersection. A tow truck arrived at the scene of the accident and offered to tow the complainant’s car to the workshop for RM150 even though the distance was very short. When asked why it was so expensive, the complainant was told that a proportion of the payment would have to be given to the police. The complainant also said that he had to pay the police to go to the workshop to take a picture of his damaged car.
‘Toll’ collection in Karak Highway
On Oct 6, 2004, the IGP despatched a team from Bukit Aman to Karak Highway after receiving a tip-off from a motorist. The entire traffic patrol unit headed by a chief inspector was nabbed for demanding bribes from motorists along Karak Highway where these policemen were conducting an operation. Senior officers from Bukit Aman arrested the 11 traffic policemen from the unit who had since been suspended pending investigations into the case.
