What is the most disadvantage about frequent track used cars and non tract use car?
I'm trying to grab the whole meaning of that sentence.
1. The most dis-advantage of frequent track used cars
2. The most dis-advantage of non-track use cars
Ok, I'm done smoking. If I'm right, you were asking what are the
bad side of
'frequent track sportscar' and
'non-track sportscar' ?
Logically thinking, the track sportscar will have endured so much torture to the chassis, transmission (gearbox, clutches etc), suspension, engine. Or in short, everything. But of course, this depends on the
"frequent-ness" of the car being on the track and the limit of the torture the car can take.
If the car is a pure track car only meant for track (not road legal), Only God knows how much the car being tortured on track by the driver, the tarmac, the pebbles, and the grass.. oh wait, not forgetting the love taps from other cars.
These cars are high maintenance type of car. Remember the rule no.30, paragraph 2 on page 54; High maintenance = Big money.
for a non-track use car, it's basically it's just what it is. Never being tortured or anything. Just like a car got off from the showroom. Unlike track car, you can maintain it normally and no big money involved (unless you break something that is expensive like gearbox for example).
so, is that the answer you looking for? I hope that'll clear your doubts.