Nicholasng925
Known Member
Nope not at all. The car works just as usual without boost, you can treat the boost as an additional amount of air pushing into the throttle body. Now you can imagine, with boost the suction of air into the air filter is way stronger than without.Hmm, wouldn't the car feel weird if drive without boost? In NA engine, the air enters from air filter and went straight on into the throttle body but for turbo, the air still need to go into the compressor and travel through the intercooler before reaching the throttle body. Such a long path for the air to take and since there is no boost at all, I guess the compressor is not sucking in air strongly like when there is boost?
Run without boost probably can help you to save more fuel.
Are you adjusting boost on the go inside your car with boost controller?
Running without boost definitely saves more fuel than with boost. But for lighter cars such as bolt-on Myvis, running with boost might save more fuel. It really depends. Sometimes it's not about the boost level but the rpm. The best rpm for fuel efficiency should be around 2.4k, but less than 3k.
I have a Works Engineering manual boost controller under the car bonnet.
Last edited: