I think the point for all this fight is for petrol kiosk owner to gain more.. but hey, everybody want more..
1st.. bank offer cc facility to petrol kiosk.. if u want, u have to pay 1.25% of sales to the bank.. <-- bad ass banks of course always wanna make money..
2nd.. Petrol kiosk say i want.. wanna attract more customer.. <-- good la, convinient mah.. petrol kiosk can make more sales
3rd.. fuel price go up.. comm maintain, interest maintain.. less profit for same amount of capital. <-- bad, less income for kiosk
4th.. fight with government.. increase comm or ban CC facility. <-- OK ma, fair fight what
5th.. Transfer the interest charge to customer.. <-- of course la bad, Petrol kiosk r the one agreed to the term before hand (to make more sales).. If Petrol Kiosk are concern about this (decrease of income due to CC facility), why agree to the term at the first place??
Zohailee, thats why there are argument here.. everybody dont agree for the interest transfer because u (petrol kiosk) ask for it at the first place.. it happens because u r tryin to get more at the first place. get my point??
if dont agree with the interest charge to you, then stop the facility la (back to the 1st case, kill the root cause).. people are angry because u r tryin to charge it to the consumer.. but dont complain later if your sales dropped..
but cc will still be accepted any way, so what the heck..