- Mar 3, 2005
- 8,180
- 3,678
- 5,213
Your car ah??
Since Kent selling buy his la....wait what time for you to learn to drive MT since you don't know how
Your car ah??
heavy stable but not planted...its the inertia..at zero speed it its planted...but gain any movement, it will have larger inertia thus slower to accelerateWhy light weight? I thot heavy car more stable and planted. Light weight will give better accelaration though.
GTR? the 1800kg theory...can't understand that..lolHeavy is only good for cruising on straights. The heavy weight will make it slower to accelerate, longer to stop, and more sluggish to change directions, plus it increases fuel consumption. Basically weight is the enemy of performance.
if if RX7 heavy...EVO can be considered superheavyweight...GTR sumo wrestler...RX-7 FD3S is light? Kidding right. Then Lotus Elise must be feather weight and Caterhams are weightless :P
Yeah the GTR is a technological marvel, it's like defying the laws of physics, simply an exceptional car!....
GTR? the 1800kg theory...can't understand that..lol
...
Because they are not conti supercar... :tongue:GTR? the 1800kg theory...can't understand that..lol
Thats exactly their intention, I remember I watched a interview on GTR designer.Yeah the GTR is a technological marvel, it's like defying the laws of physics, simply an exceptional car!
Unfortunately in Malaysia and other South East Asia countries due to the crazy taxes/duties imposed, the GTR is still for the rich only! :(Because they are not conti supercar... :tongue:
Because of its weight, GTR need more frequent, wear and tear maintainance than their main rival Porsche 2-3 times more...
Thats exactly their intention, I remember I watched a interview on GTR designer.
They know they can never get a same treat like conti supercar (Ferrari, Lambo, Porchy etc) in consumer eyes, even they have the skills to produce 1...
So in marketing prospect they throw a lovely challenge letter to conti... to make a supercar that everybody can buy (not only very rich people can affort), can drive (no need to be so tense all the time when driving it) that without follow the old conti supercar concept (MR, light weight, etc)...
Hell yeah... they did it... Yes! They DID IT !!
Look like u have good experience with this 2, mind to elaborate why u feel they are fun ?Frankly speaking, I feel its only a few Manufacturers in the world that can consistently deliver cars that are fun to drive.
Among them I can identify 2...
Anything with the Type R badge.
Anything made by Lotus.
Well Honda actually makes many boring cars too IMHO. :) Type-Rs along with NSX & S2000 are ok but the rest, not so much fun I think.Frankly speaking, I feel its only a few Manufacturers in the world that can consistently deliver cars that are fun to drive.
Among them I can identify 2...
Anything with the Type R badge.
Anything made by Lotus.
My experience with Lotus was limited to passenger seat, in Elise S1 & S2, the way that thing grips around a corner is unreal. Don't need to be in the driver's seat when you're stuck to your own passenger seat around a corner.Look like u have good experience with this 2, mind to elaborate why u feel they are fun ?
Wow! U very experienced ah! Sitting in Lotus is a real treat. I read somewhere Citroen zx also corner on rails. But I not sure what it means.My experience with Lotus was limited to passenger seat, in Elise S1 & S2, the way that thing grips around a corner is unreal. Don't need to be in the driver's seat when you're stuck to your own passenger seat around a corner.
Type R was a EK9, VTECCCCCC. Also had handling on rails. I'm not a pro driver or anything, brake, slow down & downshift, take the corner, blip the throttle gently.. and when you're exiting the corner gradually full throttle..and it always finds itself in the sweet spot.. of VTEC..it wasn't super powerful like an instant kick in the balls like turbo (EVO 8 for reference), but the matching of the VTEC while exiting the corner was fun.
I have yet to come across anybody saying these two makes are boring and dull...
Couldn't agree more on this. Myvi lots of the road definitely is not cuz it is fun to drive. Just lots youngsters are having too much imagination when driving one. Speed at 180 in that car...:afraid:Its not fun to drive... it's just cheap... distinct difference there...
What about Ford? Ford Focus RS is also known as one of the best FWD. Some reviews comparing the cars with others, it seems it is chosen as the fun to drive car.Frankly speaking, I feel its only a few Manufacturers in the world that can consistently deliver cars that are fun to drive.
Among them I can identify 2...
Anything with the Type R badge.
Anything made by Lotus.
So far really never seen BH's Supra on the streets before other than roadshows.Citroen ZX corners? That's if the hydraulics don't break first.
Ixeo : Rs are not dull or boring that's for sure. But I think it's a personal opinion whether they are great. I mean, I've driven the FC, FD, a 316Ti with a 3L BMW engine, etc and the one that always makes me want one is the FD (twin turbo variant). I'm fond of the DC2 and the EK but ultimately (for me) they were just good cars, not great. I've never sat in a Supra before but having tried to follow one in a IS200 it was bloody awesome to see it dissapear from my passanger view even though the IS200 was already maxed out. I'll bet it'll be a damn interesting drive too. But that's all my personal opinion. Not saying your choice of cars are bad, they're great. Just not as great as the FD I'm so obssessed about, personally speaking of course.
Might as well convert to manual instead a cheaper option than buying his blm.Your car ah??
Since Kent selling buy his la....wait what time for you to learn to drive MT since you don't know how