Menu
Home
Post Something
Forums
Current Activity
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
News & Features
The Marketplace
Cars for Sale
Engine and Performance
Chassis and Wheels
Exterior and Body
Interior and Cockpit
ICE - In Car Entertainment
Car Shops and Services
Toys and Wares
All Other Stuff
Jobs and Vacancies
Looking For
Members
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current Activity
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
See what others are reading now! Try Forums >
Current Activity
Home
Forums
Car Brands
Car Manufacturers
Proton
R3-Satria (gti)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crash" data-source="post: 874885" data-attributes="member: 904"><p>Let me try and answer that, although the R3 technical team may do a better job.</p><p></p><p>Chassis dyno results may vary as much as 3-4% depending on different gears used. The <strong>de facto</strong> standard is actually 4th gear.</p><p></p><p>As most people know, there are power losses through the drivetrain so wheel hp is always lower than flywheel hp. Front wheel drive cars engines tend to be more efficient than most rear drive configurations due to the layout of components. However most publications overestimate these losses considerably. Most rear drive cars have a 1 to 1, 4th gear which means that the power path goes directly through the mainshaft of the transmission. The only losses here are bearing drag which is less than 0.5% and the viscous drag of the gears running through the oil which is about 1% with hot oil. Indeed, published data indicates a transmission efficiency of 98 to 98.5% for conventional transmissions in 4th gear.</p><p></p><p>Losses within the driveshaft account for about 0.5% if they are properly aligned, balanced and with fresh U-joints.</p><p></p><p>Differential losses in the commonly used Hypoid type gearset is in the order of 6 to 10%.</p><p></p><p>The <strong>worst scenario</strong> case for a rear drive setup is on the order of 12.5% in 4th gear, not the 20 -25% often published. If 25% was being lost in the drivetrain, the oil would boil in the differential housing in short order and aluminum transmission cases would fatigue and break from the temperatures generated. On a 200 hp engine, something on the order of 37,000 watts would have to be dissipated out of the transmission and differential housings. Obviously, this is not the case.</p><p></p><p>Transverse, front drive transaxles usually have no direct lockup gears and no 1 to 1 ratio, however, since the torque path is never turned 90 degrees as in the rear drive setup and efficient helical gears are usually employed for the final drive set, losses are more on the order of 6 to 9 percent in the upper ratios.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So why 4th gear? In general, its what you call "direct drive" or "straight through" becoz of its 1 to 1 ratio, so the most optimal gear due to the least loss through drivetrain and best power reading at the wheels on the dyno!</p><p></p><p>As an example - R3 quotes about 12% loss to the drivetrain from the flywheel while Links would quote 18%. Just for kicks, let's say we have a 125whp reading from a SR3 from both dynos.</p><p></p><p></p><p>125whp + 12% = 140bhp</p><p>125whp + 18% = 147.5bhp</p><p></p><p></p><p>Do you see the discrepancy? But in general, dynos are not fantastically accurate. There are many variables to consider and these variables influence the final result. However, it is proven that dynos run on 4th are more accurate. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Dynos are a good way to benchmark your car, as a stepping stone to tune and mod it, but don't take single, one-off readings as a definitive. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Hope this helps man!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crash, post: 874885, member: 904"] Let me try and answer that, although the R3 technical team may do a better job. Chassis dyno results may vary as much as 3-4% depending on different gears used. The [b]de facto[/b] standard is actually 4th gear. As most people know, there are power losses through the drivetrain so wheel hp is always lower than flywheel hp. Front wheel drive cars engines tend to be more efficient than most rear drive configurations due to the layout of components. However most publications overestimate these losses considerably. Most rear drive cars have a 1 to 1, 4th gear which means that the power path goes directly through the mainshaft of the transmission. The only losses here are bearing drag which is less than 0.5% and the viscous drag of the gears running through the oil which is about 1% with hot oil. Indeed, published data indicates a transmission efficiency of 98 to 98.5% for conventional transmissions in 4th gear. Losses within the driveshaft account for about 0.5% if they are properly aligned, balanced and with fresh U-joints. Differential losses in the commonly used Hypoid type gearset is in the order of 6 to 10%. The [b]worst scenario[/b] case for a rear drive setup is on the order of 12.5% in 4th gear, not the 20 -25% often published. If 25% was being lost in the drivetrain, the oil would boil in the differential housing in short order and aluminum transmission cases would fatigue and break from the temperatures generated. On a 200 hp engine, something on the order of 37,000 watts would have to be dissipated out of the transmission and differential housings. Obviously, this is not the case. Transverse, front drive transaxles usually have no direct lockup gears and no 1 to 1 ratio, however, since the torque path is never turned 90 degrees as in the rear drive setup and efficient helical gears are usually employed for the final drive set, losses are more on the order of 6 to 9 percent in the upper ratios. So why 4th gear? In general, its what you call "direct drive" or "straight through" becoz of its 1 to 1 ratio, so the most optimal gear due to the least loss through drivetrain and best power reading at the wheels on the dyno![font=Arial][/font] As an example - R3 quotes about 12% loss to the drivetrain from the flywheel while Links would quote 18%. Just for kicks, let's say we have a 125whp reading from a SR3 from both dynos. 125whp + 12% = 140bhp 125whp + 18% = 147.5bhp Do you see the discrepancy? But in general, dynos are not fantastically accurate. There are many variables to consider and these variables influence the final result. However, it is proven that dynos run on 4th are more accurate. Dynos are a good way to benchmark your car, as a stepping stone to tune and mod it, but don't take single, one-off readings as a definitive. Hope this helps man! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
The Marketplace Latest
original rare Rays Volk Racing CE28 16x7jj offset...
Started by
david tao
Chassis and Wheels
Honda Jazz/Fit JSracing GTwing Spoiler
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Toyota Vios NCP93 front bonnet hood
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Honda civic fc varis spoiler
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
BMW F10 Msport front bumper set
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
BMW F30 M3/GTS front bonnet hood
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
BMW F10 vorsteiner rear bumper diffuser
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo bodykit
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
BMW F30 M3 front skirt lip
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Honda Civic FC fk7si front bumper set
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Posts refresh every 5 minutes
RCA-Ignition.my Track Day 26/9/2010 9am-12noon RM300 only!
RCA-Ignition.my Track Day Sunday 26th Sept 2010, 0900-1200noon
Hari Raya Special, RM...
The non-car related Activities !
Dear members,
We can't have all events related to cars rite? so we are planning on some activities to have more fun.. just keep it short..
Anybody wants to play -Paintball-?
(please don't ask where and how much for...
Ulu Yam - Gohtong Trip : 16 Dec 2007
Here are some pics taken. Abit poor quality but i guess it'll do. Here ya go
View attachment 636041
View attachment 636042
edited: video add on
comments: "When they slowed down, i finally had the...
Recent Posts
Darker Design : Mercedes-Benz Launches GLA Nightfall Edition in Malaysia
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Honda Malaysia Doubles Down on Hybrids: New CR-V Launches with Dual e:HEV...
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
BateriHub Reaches 200-Store Milestone, Becomes Malaysia’s Largest...
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Been stalking for 3 years edy
Started by
dheepadarshan95
Introduction and Newbies
Recommendation: Turbocharger for 4B11 N.A engine
Started by
Mitevo7
Car Modification
Search
Online now
Enjoying Zerotohundred?
Log-in
for an ad-less experience
Home
Forums
Car Brands
Car Manufacturers
Proton
R3-Satria (gti)