Confused... Different people say different thing... Which is better? Some report that fixed strut bar do not have hinge and will cause you chassis at the strut tower to tear during chassis flex. Is it true?
The sole purpose of strut bar is to prevent chassis flex..
a fixed strut bar will do just that..
a hinged strut bar will bend at the joints. thus allow chassis flex.. in other words is useless..
peace.. out![]()
Haha... Af first I also thought of this.... but after some study and simulation, I found that the important thing in the function of the strut bar is that as long as the length of the bar remain the same, is serves its purpose. The angle between the mounting and the bar doesn't matter. I mean of course if it is fixed, it is better. But the incompressibility of the bar (side to side ---> push away from the centre, the bar will resist it because it cannot be compressed. The length of the bar is still fixed.
Actually I'm just afraid that the bars tear the chassis haha... Still confused...
ok.. lets do an experiment..
take a piece of paper (preferably from ur dustbin to save paper & trees..)
now tear it with ur hands.. easy right? coz ur hands are independent from one to another
then, take a regular/hinged handcuff & handcuff urself & tear the same size paper.. not so easy right? but still can tear..
now, take a fixed handcuff (one piece of metal to handcuff urself) & tear.. almost impossible right?
ok.. now read the experiment again & replace this words..
Paper = Chassis
Hand = Absorber
Handcuff = Strut bar..
Gudluck![]()
Hahaha.. Very nice analogy... But sure is you use the fixed handcuffs, and got a strong force pushing the hands, the hand won't tear away ya :tongue:... :vroam: