Custom Throttle Manifold Discussion

just wondering...the reason y wanna mod the intake manifold is to increase air intake...wont this require an upgraded fuel system or will the standard fuel system be enough(i know it should be a case by case study based on the car's original fuel system's upper limit, but how much air intake increase are we talking about when we modifiy the intake manifold)?

i was wondering also about wat TR said....for the whole of yesterday actualy hehehe. so i googled it up n i think i've found it here at howstuffworks.com

The intake system on a four-stroke car engine has one main goal, to get as much air-fuel mixture into the cylinder as possible. One way to help the intake is by tuning the lengths of the pipes.

When the intake valve is open on the engine, air is being sucked into the engine, so the air in the intake runner is moving rapidly toward the cylinder. When the intake valve closes suddenly, this air slams to a stop and stacks up on itself, forming an area of high pressure. This high-pressure wave makes its way up the intake runner away from the cylinder. When it reaches the end of the intake runner, where the runner connects to the intake manifold, the pressure wave bounces back down the intake runner.

If the intake runner is just the right length, that pressure wave will arrive back at the intake valve just as it opens for the next cycle. This extra pressure helps cram more air-fuel mix into the cylinder -- effectively acting like a turbocharger.

The problem with this technique is that it only provides a benefit in a fairly narrow speed range. The pressure wave travels at the speed of sound (which depends on the density of the air) down the intake runner. The speed will vary a little bit depending on the temperature of the air and the speed it is moving, but a good guess for the speed of sound would be 1,300 feet per second (fps). Let's try to get an idea how long the intake runner would have to be to take advantage of this effect.

Let's say the engine is running at 5,000 rpm. The intake valve opens once every two revolutions (720 degrees), but let's say they stay open for 250 degrees. That means that there are 470 degrees between when the intake valve closes and when it opens again. At 5,000 rpm it will take the engine 0.012 seconds to turn one revolution, and 470 degrees is about 1.31 revolutions, so it takes 0.0156 seconds between when the valve closes and when it opens again. At 1,300 fps multiplied by 0.0156 seconds, the pressure wave would travel about 20 feet. But, since must go up the intake runner and then come back, the intake runner would only have to be half this length or about 10 feet.

Two things become apparent after doing this calculation:

1. The tuning of the intake runner will only have an effect in a fairly narrow RPM range. If we redo the calculation at 3,000 rpm, the length calculated would be completely different.
2. Ten feet is too long. You can't fit pipes that long under the hood of a car very easily.

There is not too much that can be done about the first problem. A tuned intake has its main benefit in a very narrow speed range. But there is a way to shorten the intake runners and still get some benefit from the pressure wave. If we shorten the intake runner length by a factor of four, making it 2.5 feet, the pressure wave will travel up and down the pipe four times before the intake valve opens again. But it still arrives at the valve at the right time.

There are a lot of intricacies and tricks to intake systems. For instance, it is beneficial to have the intake air moving as fast as possible into the cylinders. This increases the turbulence and mixes the fuel with the air better. One way to increase the air velocity is to use a smaller diameter intake runner. Since roughly the same volume of air enters the cylinder each cycle, if you pump that air through a smaller diameter pipe it will have to go faster.

The downside to using smaller diameter intake runners is that at high engine speeds when lots of air is going through the pipes, the restriction from the smaller diameter may inhibit airflow. So for the large airflows at higher speeds it is better to have large diameter pipes. Some carmakers attempt to get the best of both worlds by using dual intake runners for each cylinder -- one with a small diameter and one with a large diameter. They use a butterfly valve to close off the large diameter runner at lower engine speeds where the narrow runner can help performance. Then the valve opens up at higher engine speeds to reduce the intake restriction, increasing the top end power output.


so the main function of the intake manifold is to bounce the airwave in the runner so it forces more air into the engine as the intake valve opens...so by modifying the intake manifold...yr just simply tuning the manifold to jam more air in at a certain RPM...so now...y not make a runner that is variable? imagine a runner with several tubes which in turn opens via a butterfly valve at certain RPM(since higher RPM requires more air, which means a larger runner will supply more of the air at the same frequency correct?) wont that help? once again. correct me if i'm wrong...trying to understand the mechanics....:biggrin:
 
Arturo, IAFM is something like what you said....
 
Last edited:
i think so la(from wat i understand, their systems are controlled by butterfly valves?)...but their variable system is like the old Vtec when first developed...only cuts in at certain revs...wat i was thinking bout was something that follows the revs ie. no longer either on or off but variable. E-tech developed a control system that can electronically activate any servo/valve/whatever at pre-set revs. maybe can combine his controller with a set of runners instead of just an on off system..sort of like a 3 stage vtec? is it really needed? issit that a static runner is most efficient within a set of rpm lets say +-5000rpm so more than an on-off system is needed?

if a static runner runs most effecient at lets say +-1000rpm then lets say yr engine's red line is at 9k rpm...so 8 runners?

1k rpm ->2k rpm, 1 runner is in open mode
2k rpm ->3k rpm, 2 runners n so on n so forth...

does my theory hold any water? heheh today is friday mah...more free time from work so can spend some time thinking about this
 
similar to toyota TVIS and VIM tech too???

Yes, similar.

Arturo, just my wild imagination la....what if in the future engineers can develop an intelligent material couple with the ECU and car engine....The intelligent material will use to make the intake manifold and the shape of the IM will evolve automatically.......It means that the IM & runners will look different at different speed....

Low speed, it will have longer and small runners and when the RPM keep increasing it will change it's runners size, length and the plenum size..something that evolve....

You know, now car engineers are still RnDing paints that will heal itself if it got chipped or damage, car body that will change back to it's original shape or can be altered according to driver's emotion...etc..many...maybe this would 1 day be in the RnD too..
 
as i knw...campro cps VIM are fully electronic control and normal campro IAFM using vacuum control...
 
TR..yah yah the BMW with fabric skin. i remember that.

i think u grasped my idea already? is the mechanical equivalent for a morphing material la. but there already are memory materials out there which works by passing current in them to make them change shape...maybe this could be used ( http://neurophilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/03/25/mit-researchers-develop-morphing-material/ ) there is already similar and available tech called memory metals? but that changes shapes via temperature...that wont work for the intake manifold...go up genting suck cold air...go KL jam n stuck in Pudu jam suck hot air...how to control?

since the material already developed but price sure too high..mechanical method still the best loh. i'm just thinking about the tuning...sure headache.

Blank...vaccum controlled? but thats for the amount of suction the intake allows based on revs rite? still confined by the size of intake wooor...need to go do some more research on how campro's iafm works...
 
Last edited:
arturo, I think what blank is saying:

the tech is similar only the way of making it work is different.

correct ah Blank?
 
yea...

operating principle/function is just almost the same just the mechanical things that make a lot of different...
 
hehehhe ya loh TR...i read IAFM but didnt notice he said VIM.

Blank...wat u said is true...sort of understand how iafm works but still unsure how vim works - mechanically...u know how ar?

the more i research ar...the more i think multiple runner length/volume IM can be done...i think that would be the future instead of on-off systems that we have now...
 
sorry for the late respond... been trying to understand the formula and busy...

here is the formula to caculate the runner length.

L=[(ECD x 0.25 x V x 2) / (rpm x RV) - (D/2)

ECD = effective cam duration (720 - Adv duration - 30)

V= pressure wave speed (usually is 1300 ft/s)

RV = Reflective Value (this value i think is the which set of pressure wave you want to use. if you use 1 set of pressure wave mean the pressure wave will travel 1 time up and down of the runner. if you use 2 set of pressure wave mean it will travel 2 time up and down. this is to reduce the lenght of the runner as the time require to travel will be same.)

D = runner diameter in inches

the runner length must include the length from your intake manifold gasket to your inlet valve. so you will have to subtract the lenght of gasket to your valve to get your manifold runner lenght.

i am still trying to understand the rest of the stuff....
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Posts refresh every 5 minutes




Search

Online now

Enjoying Zerotohundred?

Log-in for an ad-less experience