B-series outputting more than 300hp.

That is a very fat tourqe with "fair" high end power. My guess is you using 48mm thrott ITB with a 3 inch (or less) intake plenum before butterfly to have that kind of powerband. It must be more than 2 litre (long block) ? Where are the injector placement, on the head or after butterfly ?

The itb's a little bigger, and trumpets are 3 inchers.. intake plenum not used, the itb's trumpets points right at the firewall. displacement, kind of obvious when you saw the torque, I think.

Injectors.. not at the head.
 
Last edited:
50mm + injectors 2 inches before head + 3 inch trumpets ?? = TWM or

50mm + injectors after butterfly + 1 1/2 inch trumpets= Toda (definetely not Toda)

Any photos of the ITB:listen:
 
No photoes atm.
OER's & TWM, the velocity stack appears to be directly influenced by the trumpet length, they are one piece.

But I wonder if you can count Toda's by basing it on the trumpet length alone.. sure the trumpets are a little on the short side, but considering the trumpet extenders (not sure what they're called), they are not a short velocity stack setup, aren't they?
 
How do you MAPped it right with TWM :hmmmm: where you get the reading from ?

MAP sensor tapping?
That's strange, because TWM gives the vacuum accumulator/vacuum log along (unless you bought it without, I dunno lah), so tap from that, you might need a vacuum distribution block for the brakes and fuel regulator and other vac-reference required sensors(map) or meters/auxbox whatever.

You can look up the design from golden eagle and other manufacturers and machine one up, or order if you want the bling bling logo on it.

Toda doesn't, you have the vac ports on the velocity stacks (or was it on the adapter end for the head? I forget), tap them to a vacuum log or something, I remember seeing a ghetto setup where the ITB's vacuum log was a short plastic pipe.. WTF? You buy a few thousand ringgit ITB and you use an el-cheapo plastic pipe for a vacuum log? WTF indeed.....:banghead:

Go machine shop and machine one also not that expensive I think.. plastic... NUTS!

As with all ITB's using MAP sensors, there is the slight problem of having zero vacuum at part throttle at low rpms, which is usually the case with running super huge throttle bodies on the plenum, or having ITBs (which has huge part throttle openings as well). The slow pistons speeds are not generating enough air speed to generate vacuum at the vacuum log, so your fuelling is jumping from one end to another in the fuel/ignition mapping, and if you set it to compensate, your WOT torque at low rpm is going to be crap.

If you are familiar with MAP based fuel maps, that's the problem because fuelling can never be regulated constantly at low rpm because the MAP sensor isn't getting good vacuum signal, at low pistons speeds (aka low rpm).

There's way of going around that by running high engine idle, FICD, etc. but when you spend that much for ITBs and use VAFC, something must be wrong somewhere.. lol. When you play with alpha-n, all becomes clear how ITBs are supposed to be tune, and that problem with daily drivability, idling, etc goes away.

So you have to tune by TPS percentage(also known as alpha-n). There's also the option in hondata of running partial TPS mode at low rpm and switching to MAP at high rpm (where the map can read proper vacuum, thanks to higher piston speeds) in Hondata for better fuel economy

(and also compensation for elevation changes/colder hotter air - in theory).

The theory part begins (I never tested this, so it's theory)
In theory, full alpha-n systems don't compensate fuelling like map systems based on pressure and intake temp, so elevation changes don't affect fuelling on alpha-n systems, unlike MAP, so that's why hondata offers it (so does crome, I think).

This is what I understood from what little hondata admins told me (about why we still retain MAP sensor when we run TPS based map/alpha-n.)

For this setup, it's managed by powerFC, and damn, is the two similar.. except for a few missing features, not sure if it's the FCdatalogit or commander unit, or maybe the original japan software has more features not shown in FC datalogit.

Tuning by alpha-n, it's very easy to get it to idle... PowerFC goes one better and does it automatically, once you set the parameters. Might be a good thing or a bad thing, because you need to just leave it for a few minutes while it corrects, (waste time, waste fuel?)

That's one feature I didn't know existed till I played with it.. Auto idle adjustment, just start and leave it, powerFC does the rest. (O_o)

Only did a base tune on one before so it's drivable, not for power though, so didn't play with post vtec rpms.

You might want to run open loop for better idling too, as the compensation on honda ecu's are horribly strict.. they want you to idle/cruise at stoich, and they adjust fuelling to suit. Kind of irritating once you get used to the throttle response when you run open loop. I've run open loop for close to a year now, and never looked back. closed loop is a form of their compensation to fit emission laws. We don't have that yet, so enjoy it while it lasts.. >P

I'm not entirely sure what purpose the MAP sensor has in the powerfc or hondata, but for this setup, it's connected anyway, though fuelling with alpha-n doesn't seem to need it, maybe for compensation factors, in which case, the theory part might be wrong about full alpha-n not having compensation.

Opps... I just checked the hondata prog I have.. the MAP sensor IS for atmospheric compensation.. I guess that's the primary reason for retaining the MAP sensor, but for hondata, you can actually turn it off. I didn't notice it before... :banghead: I didn't notice this in FC-datalogit too, though it's probably there.

Or maybe hondata admins meant what they said for MAF sensor engines running ITBs? there's no clear way of having atmospheric compensation for MAF type engine management.
 
Last edited:
My bad,,,all i was thinking is about Jenvey unit which only have brake booster. Yup i do noticed MAP signal lined within the butterfly for TWM but some ppl still tuned it with TPS only with such a good results, so i was thinking you doing the same thing ?!?

Until know i still couldnt figure out how the hell they did that, with an ITB like Jenvey & such. Shiro ive been playing with ITB for almost 6 years now on non VTEC engine,,,my advise for you is "you revealing too much" better keep it tight & closed,,,no point educating mass audience with this infos,,,serious.
 
Last edited:
knowledge sharing is good... not all u know will 100% correct. discussion can give better result...
i believe that u also got knowledge from somewhere/someone else, even its from the net...
do u think u know ABC if there is no one teach u... what if ur teacher decide to keep the ABC lesson for himself? hahahha...
 
shiro, u right about the open loop... really love it... i think we can still enjoy it for next 10 years...
 
My bad,,,all i was thinking is about Jenvey unit which only have brake booster. Yup i do noticed MAP signal lined within the butterfly for TWM but some ppl still tuned it with TPS only with such a good results, so i was thinking you doing the same thing ?!?

Until know i still couldnt figure out how the hell they did that, with an ITB like Jenvey & such. Shiro ive been playing with ITB for almost 6 years now on non VTEC engine,,,my advise for you is "you revealing too much" better keep it tight & closed,,,no point educating mass audience with this infos,,,serious.

Revealing too much? I doubt most people even understand half of what's written here... and I'm still learning really, just learned about ITBs when suddenly a couple of fellas here bought them.

You don't need the MAP really, like I said, hondata even allows turning it off when running alpha-n. I think it's still need to be there though, unless you can get rid of the pesky checklight (I'm gonna ask hondata admins about this). I'm pretty sure I can run it with alpha-n with the MAP disconnected. Most engines running MAF sensor (with cars using MAF) don't even need map, so I don't think it was ever a requirement in the first place.. heck in the old days of carbs, did we even need to mess with airflow sensors? fuelling was jetting, and that was it.

Now if you ask me how to apply a MAF type engine management into an ITB, I don't know.. maybe need to fabricate a plenum and intake pipe, but other than that.. zero knowledge, theory at best.

If you mean vacuum accumulators, it's like the old days of carbs, you put a port in an air pathway, and if the air velocity is enough, it'll suck air.. (or fuel, in case of carbs.) amount depending on angle and hole size I think. and as usual low speed = no vacuum or very little. (for carbs it doesn't matter, it just picks off less fuel) I think jenvey sure has to has this, because some of our stuff like brakes always needs vacuum assist. (maybe there's brakes that don't, I don't know)

BTW, the I noticed that you mentioned the brake booster. AFAIK, brake booster is the vacuum accumulator, v8_nutter. You just need this
Golden Eagle Mfg. - Vacuum Manifold

Use it in between the brake booster hose and brake servo.
The ports are there, and voila, you have vacuum ports for whatever things you want to do.

I'm still confused about the how vacuum log volume affects vacuum though, but I'll figure it out somehow/later/whenever?

Still ITBs are still black arts for me atm, so no worries about me revealing too much, My fingers itching for an ITB (maybe mod one from the 4AG) for a daily driver, but dust and all.. I think not.. but i'd be great for an experiment.

If I had ITBs of my own, I'd have a hell of a time experimenting if I had my own. with my standalone ECU, wideband 02 with g-sensor, I'd be happy like a clam in the mud.

Anyway, without base knowledge, most people would probably blow their engine first than get a tune right. :P

For me, power is just the outcome, the fun is messing with mods.

Come to think of it, I should have played with carbs.. much cheaper and simpler to mess with.
 
Last edited:
I doubt most people even understand half of what's written here...

:itsme:
hehe,... bro shiro, i dont even know what ITB stands for,... pity me!!!
wuikks, sorry for this interuption,...

carry on guyz,...
 
Revealing too much? I doubt most people even understand half of what's written here... and I'm still learning really, just learned about ITBs when suddenly a couple of fellas here bought them.

You don't need the MAP really, like I said, hondata even allows turning it off when running alpha-n. I think it's still need to be there though, unless you can get rid of the pesky checklight (I'm gonna ask hondata admins about this). I'm pretty sure I can run it with alpha-n with the MAP disconnected. Most engines running MAF sensor (with cars using MAF) don't even need map, so I don't think it was ever a requirement in the first place.. heck in the old days of carbs, did we even need to mess with airflow sensors? fuelling was jetting, and that was it.

Now if you ask me how to apply a MAF type engine management into an ITB, I don't know.. maybe need to fabricate a plenum and intake pipe, but other than that.. zero knowledge, theory at best.

If you mean vacuum accumulators, it's like the old days of carbs, you put a port in an air pathway, and if the air velocity is enough, it'll suck air.. (or fuel, in case of carbs.) amount depending on angle and hole size I think. and as usual low speed = no vacuum or very little. (for carbs it doesn't matter, it just picks off less fuel) I think jenvey sure has to has this, because some of our stuff like brakes always needs vacuum assist. (maybe there's brakes that don't, I don't know)

BTW, the I noticed that you mentioned the brake booster. AFAIK, brake booster is the vacuum accumulator, v8_nutter. You just need this
Golden Eagle Mfg. - Vacuum Manifold

Use it in between the brake booster hose and brake servo.
The ports are there, and voila, you have vacuum ports for whatever things you want to do.

I'm still confused about the how vacuum log volume affects vacuum though, but I'll figure it out somehow/later/whenever?

Still ITBs are still black arts for me atm, so no worries about me revealing too much, My fingers itching for an ITB (maybe mod one from the 4AG) for a daily driver, but dust and all.. I think not.. but i'd be great for an experiment.

If I had ITBs of my own, I'd have a hell of a time experimenting if I had my own. with my standalone ECU, wideband 02 with g-sensor, I'd be happy like a clam in the mud.

Anyway, without base knowledge, most people would probably blow their engine first than get a tune right. :P

For me, power is just the outcome, the fun is messing with mods.

Come to think of it, I should have played with carbs.. much cheaper and simpler to mess with.


I beg to differ, TPS tuning cannot read compression real time. It only assume having a right "mixture" we call it linear reading on the exact opening. Futhermore TPS will having problem on a low altitude (or latitude) area which result thinning air.

FYI MAF cannot run open throttle.

Using brake booster as part of reading is a wrong way to do, you will have soggy brakes, ive been experienced this since year 2004. Dont get fooled by big names the best is still modificationing/upgrading from the aftermarket.
 
knowledge sharing is good... not all u know will 100% correct. discussion can give better result...
i believe that u also got knowledge from somewhere/someone else, even its from the net...
do u think u know ABC if there is no one teach u... what if ur teacher decide to keep the ABC lesson for himself? hahahha...

Nope i dont get this knowledge from the net, i gain knowledge from building one with my mechanic. I dont want to be a jerk,,,but i knew i what i knew its God given knowledge and skills.
 
shiroi,
ive not been away, just that ive been reading and watch your upcomings. the thing abt the hondata unlike aem ems, it runs totally on alpha-n. if ure talking abt the best plug and play ems that runs both world (tps and map), pay abit more then u get the aem ems. i think ive written in the old threads abt the consistency using map at low revs. fine tuning is required and calibration from time to time.

crome has that feature and its good if ure on the street level. on the drag level tuning, alpha-n is the way to go.
whatever you have written, its all good. that is something u dont have to worry. its a good reading revision for me and probably the others.

v8nutter,
the main reason with ppl using tps alone and getting good results is due to the fact it doesnt flactuates like map. there is a certain level of requirement for you to use tps only or tps and map together. but then again, i believe your expectation and personal goals of your ITB projects are all meant for all-out drag racing. that is why using map is definitely not a good idea, its a no-no thing. you may want to consider haltech or motec for your advance ems.

actually what shiroi is doing is already good enough to teach, discuss and promote new ideas. it seems that u have been keeping too much of what you're doing that made you felt uneasy when shiroi started to share the key-points to ITB tuning. some people may confuse and some ppl like me may be smiling. if you have notice, if ure playing honda, its all about cash and carry. maybe the pain, effort and hardship towards building that monster mivec that made you want to keep everything silence. i respect that. but we have a long way to go to educate ppl regarding ITB. let alone those ppl that believe plenum is better than ITB. so lets be cool with it bro. i think the new zealanders seems to love your secrecy :p

fobs,
there're aplenty of technical stuffs on ITBS/quads on the net. take your time.

udengfahlawi,
have your twms arrive yet?
 
shiroi,
ive not been away, just that ive been reading and watch your upcomings. the thing abt the hondata unlike aem ems, it runs totally on alpha-n. if ure talking abt the best plug and play ems that runs both world (tps and map), pay abit more then u get the aem ems. i think ive written in the old threads abt the consistency using map at low revs. fine tuning is required and calibration from time to time.

That's not entirely correct, J101, and if you're having hondata s300j, this is how you would do it.

tpsmapbased.jpg


As for AEM EMS, that's probably the one of the best mass market 'professional' stanalone unit available.

Multiple ignition output for coil on plug setup, ability to control more than 4 injectors for two injectors per cylinder setup, etc. etc.

But the price is triple that of hondata. Now that's a bit of a problem for regular enthusiasts.

I'd have gone AEM EMS for flexibility, but price was a big deterrent. Heck, people are lamenting the high price of hondata already.

Crome is a bit cheaper than hondata, but it's a bit fiddly for everyday use. A single USB cable is all that's required for hondata, and for that convenience you pay a little more for it.

When you start mounting a wideband unit, and other related stuff, suddenly having only one cable is a boon.

I think PLX devices AFR wideband solutions are much more friendlier ATM. Innovate and it's stubborness sticking to serial connection and delays of Logworks3 will be it's downfall, unless it starts bucking up and releasing updated software with more functionality.
 
Last edited:
J101, any progress on your side? The sample above what I discovered, after experimenting with secondary maps like I mentioned in the hondata review in the old old thread.
 
shiroi,
i believe it should be best chosen tps(low) and map(high), that is if you want to use both ways. if you are using high cams and fully built engine then go alpha-n for both primary and secondary. but then again, the appropriate vacuum hoses and canister box should be properly in placed. even these days i see they have used steel braided hoses to the vacuum canister. must be awfully MAPped :p

the project is on going. maybe after the xmas and new year holidays i should get the software.
 

Similar threads

Posts refresh every 5 minutes




Search

Online now

Enjoying Zerotohundred?

Log-in for an ad-less experience