Menu
Home
Post Something
Forums
Current Activity
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
News & Features
The Marketplace
Cars for Sale
Engine and Performance
Chassis and Wheels
Exterior and Body
Interior and Cockpit
ICE - In Car Entertainment
Car Shops and Services
Toys and Wares
All Other Stuff
Jobs and Vacancies
Looking For
Members
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current Activity
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
See what others are reading now! Try Forums >
Current Activity
Home
Forums
Car Brands
Car Manufacturers
Proton
Satria Neo Forums
Air filter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Izso" data-source="post: 1064636252" data-attributes="member: 2429"><p>I saw that test. But the test bed was dated. These days cars have MAF/MAP and adjust based on the amount of O2 and airflow, etc. I've personally tried a few filters and methods : </p><p></p><p>1. Drop in K&N : normal filter, serviceable but the oiling was tricky. Too much and it'll clog the sensors with oil. Kena a few times before. Performance was better than stock paper but not much. Could just feel less restriction when revving low to mid-high. </p><p></p><p>2. Drop in metal mesh : mid to high worked better compared to stock paper filter. Free-er to rev in that range and more responsive. But it only filtered out reasonably large stones and leaves. Small dust particles and mud still went through. EO got dirty real fast and kept constantly needing to clean dust from the TB.</p><p></p><p>3. Apexi Open pod with insulated air ram and CAI hose directing from the front bumper (no heat shield) : This was pretty interesting, lots of revs but no power gain at all. Very loud noises and the high rev range was very responsive but heavy loss of low end torque. </p><p></p><p>4. Apexi open pod inside stock airbox and stock everything. Original U-snorkel removed so air in bumper was going upwards directly into the airbox. : Loud noises, mid to high rev range was good but still some loss in low end torque.</p><p></p><p>5. Stock everything except original drop in filter was cut away leaving only the frame and the Apexi open pod was connected to the end of the U-snorkel in the bumper : This setup worked great. Improvement across the rev range and no loud induction noise. Problem was the pod got dirty verrrrrrrrrry fast. Accessing it was easy for me though.</p><p></p><p>6. Custom piping from the intake all the way down to the bumper (full straight piping and insulated) connected to the Apexi open pod : This worked even better than stock. The setup was flimsy cuz the piping was only held up by cable ties and the clamp at the manifold. Improvements across the whole rev range.</p><p></p><p>8. No air filter and direct from CAI into the manifold : This was stupid. Loud and no power gain whatsoever but the revs were so light but didn't translate into any usable power. It would rev to kingdom come without any restrictions though, so that was good for high end revving. </p><p></p><p>All tested in my wira with front bumper that had a hole with a velocity stack type hole directing directly at the u-snorkel / apexi open pod, similar to M3 design. Hehehe.. yeah right. Anyway, worth noting car was not stock. So for it to adjust to the extra air, it did produce some notable differences. </p><p></p><p>All these tests proved that there were no improvements in power, just shifting the usable torque / powerband and that the stock setup isn't that bad. Also it helped me figure out that if your car isn't modified for that much air, it won't make much of a difference. <strong>So morale of the story is mod your car.</strong> <img src="https://zerotohundred.com/forums/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/biggrin.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":biggrin:" title="Biggrin :biggrin:" data-shortname=":biggrin:" /><span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">---------- Post added at 08:10 AM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 08:03 AM ----------</span></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"></span></p><p><span style="color: Silver"></span>Sh*t... I re-read what I typed and even I'm confused. Hope you guys understood all that crap.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Izso, post: 1064636252, member: 2429"] I saw that test. But the test bed was dated. These days cars have MAF/MAP and adjust based on the amount of O2 and airflow, etc. I've personally tried a few filters and methods : 1. Drop in K&N : normal filter, serviceable but the oiling was tricky. Too much and it'll clog the sensors with oil. Kena a few times before. Performance was better than stock paper but not much. Could just feel less restriction when revving low to mid-high. 2. Drop in metal mesh : mid to high worked better compared to stock paper filter. Free-er to rev in that range and more responsive. But it only filtered out reasonably large stones and leaves. Small dust particles and mud still went through. EO got dirty real fast and kept constantly needing to clean dust from the TB. 3. Apexi Open pod with insulated air ram and CAI hose directing from the front bumper (no heat shield) : This was pretty interesting, lots of revs but no power gain at all. Very loud noises and the high rev range was very responsive but heavy loss of low end torque. 4. Apexi open pod inside stock airbox and stock everything. Original U-snorkel removed so air in bumper was going upwards directly into the airbox. : Loud noises, mid to high rev range was good but still some loss in low end torque. 5. Stock everything except original drop in filter was cut away leaving only the frame and the Apexi open pod was connected to the end of the U-snorkel in the bumper : This setup worked great. Improvement across the rev range and no loud induction noise. Problem was the pod got dirty verrrrrrrrrry fast. Accessing it was easy for me though. 6. Custom piping from the intake all the way down to the bumper (full straight piping and insulated) connected to the Apexi open pod : This worked even better than stock. The setup was flimsy cuz the piping was only held up by cable ties and the clamp at the manifold. Improvements across the whole rev range. 8. No air filter and direct from CAI into the manifold : This was stupid. Loud and no power gain whatsoever but the revs were so light but didn't translate into any usable power. It would rev to kingdom come without any restrictions though, so that was good for high end revving. All tested in my wira with front bumper that had a hole with a velocity stack type hole directing directly at the u-snorkel / apexi open pod, similar to M3 design. Hehehe.. yeah right. Anyway, worth noting car was not stock. So for it to adjust to the extra air, it did produce some notable differences. All these tests proved that there were no improvements in power, just shifting the usable torque / powerband and that the stock setup isn't that bad. Also it helped me figure out that if your car isn't modified for that much air, it won't make much of a difference. [b]So morale of the story is mod your car.[/b] :biggrin:[COLOR="Silver"] [SIZE=1]---------- Post added at 08:10 AM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 08:03 AM ----------[/SIZE] [/COLOR]Sh*t... I re-read what I typed and even I'm confused. Hope you guys understood all that crap. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
The Marketplace Latest
original rare Rays Volk Racing CE28 16x7jj offset...
Started by
david tao
Chassis and Wheels
Honda Jazz/Fit JSracing GTwing Spoiler
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Toyota Vios NCP93 front bonnet hood
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Honda civic fc varis spoiler
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
BMW F10 Msport front bumper set
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
BMW F30 M3/GTS front bonnet hood
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
BMW F10 vorsteiner rear bumper diffuser
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo bodykit
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
BMW F30 M3 front skirt lip
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Honda Civic FC fk7si front bumper set
Started by
jeff6126
Exterior and Body
Posts refresh every 5 minutes
is it worth to mod rb20
is it any worth to mod rb20?
n what options do those who running it..
Txn 2008
Anyone going?
i need help about loan..
hi who can help me ?
i from penang island .
where can get loan 4.5 interest ?
public bank = i ask already cant coz the car year max 14 years cant loan
ambank = no rx7 loan list -.-"
(this i ask at relau there ...)...
Recent Posts
Darker Design : Mercedes-Benz Launches GLA Nightfall Edition in Malaysia
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Honda Malaysia Doubles Down on Hybrids: New CR-V Launches with Dual e:HEV...
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
BateriHub Reaches 200-Store Milestone, Becomes Malaysia’s Largest...
Started by
The_Mechanic
News and Features
Been stalking for 3 years edy
Started by
dheepadarshan95
Introduction and Newbies
Recommendation: Turbocharger for 4B11 N.A engine
Started by
Mitevo7
Car Modification
Search
Online now
Enjoying Zerotohundred?
Log-in
for an ad-less experience
Home
Forums
Car Brands
Car Manufacturers
Proton
Satria Neo Forums
Air filter