Forced induction or bigger CC! which is the one?

[BLaCkHoWLiNG]

Come come... discuss

 

[khoyos]

i was thinking about the same thing too...

1uz or 2jz for my car. finally chose 2jz cos if i choose to be crazy later, i dont have to spend a million bucks to have a custom exhaust manifold made...

what about big cc PLUS forced induction? 1uz twin turbo? hehehe i cant afford that...

 

[serigala]

i'm sticking to forced induction...
geez..no wonder i love mt 13b soo much..

 

[BLaCkHoWLiNG]

muhahahaa... actually both has its pros and cons...

 

[BLaCkHoWLiNG]

Khoyos:

u wanna see v8? here here...

V8 E34 with Interceptor

wanna see turbo (2.5 only laa) here here.

E30 with 1ZJ

How's the progress of yr 2JZ transplant?

 

[khoyos]

i have no idea what's going on. no gearbox yet cos the guy who owe me money still havent paid yet.
so the waiting game continues...

 

[BLaCkHoWLiNG]

sigh..dat's always d case...

 

[dfx16]

Common say..
No displacement for replacement..

 

[BLaCkHoWLiNG]

more boost = more fun

 

[lozo]

no replacement for displacement is ...no longer accurate. f1 produces about 800hp for only 2.4 liter of displacement

 

[deacon]

I hate to throw spanners, but F1 is hardly a good reference of that saying.

I prefer highly tuned NA engines of the 3L and above variety. Turbos are nice but don't necessarily add to overall power delivery (Long power bands as opposed to narrow ones).

 

[BLaCkHoWLiNG]

each has its pros and cons...

 

[khoyos]

well, it is true that NA is better at the pinnacle of motorsport. but to us "mere mortals" who has to earn money to modify cars, turbocharging is the "cheaper" way to gain power hehehe

 

[BLaCkHoWLiNG]

khoyos: very well said... :)

 

[bebolagalas T]

no replacement for displacement is ...no longer accurate. f1 produces about 800hp for only 2.4 liter of displacement

muahaha...1 unit of f1 engine can buy how many 1j or 2j or rb or etc..

no need big engine la in malaysia...better used forced induction for more power..