- Dec 24, 2006
- 137
- 1
- 1,518
Yeah but track cars are different. They've been tuned hardcore for the purpose of only racing. Our cars are still street cars so a lot of R & D and $$ has being spent to run under such conditions. J's and the likes track cars can also run open pod because they're moving continuously so there's always air flowing. On the street, when you're stationary, there's more hot air building up in the engine bay then cool air flowing in.That's true, temps play a big part.
I believe it's something to do with the way the ECU handles fuelling and ignition. Playing with hondata, I realized that even with the stock ECU, the fueling and ignition is compensated depending on IAT as well, which is why cold intakes seems to give better performance.
But if you noticed track cars from various j-manufacturers, they actually run open pods, so I think by reducing compensation on the ECU based on IAT, open pods can achieve the performance as well.
For mine, stock airbox gave me worst performance, but we all know that depending on situation, the mileage may vary. So testing is the best way.
I like AEM's intake, but worries of hydrolock abounds if its used as a daily driver... too many rainwater filled potholes in Malaysia. if 50cc or so of water gets into the engine.. bye bye engine.. (O_o)
Yes a believe open pod can give good performance but in my opinion, both open and close box can give equal performance. It comes down to what the car is used for... The only awesome as filter kit is the Mugen V2 Carbon intake. Nothing comes close to it. I've driven a couple of Rs with this and it sounds like it's running an open box. If you slap a J's racing air duct, you get even better results. Leave the intake the stock honda one but no fear, you still use other intakes on. Avoid using aluminium or stainless one because they absorb heat. You're better off with FRP and CF air intakes. My 2 cents