RM21,001 still cannot get Evo X halfcut
RM21,001 still cannot get Evo X halfcut
i would say, honda insight, because the savings in gas would pay for the difference , also cbu quality is much better than malaysian ckd. japanese people have their pride on their cars
How about the Nissan Sentra 1.6? New price list is also 80+ (not sure about discounts if can drop under 80k). Then used one (2008/9) around 60+. Since it's a 1.6ltr, then the road tax is still cheap (RM90) but more powerful than those other 1.5ltr cars.
Just curious as well cus I'm also looking for cars around the same budget, and no one so far has mentioned this car. Or are there some issues with it?
let's not introduce used to the discussion since all along its been about new cars. that being said, that car is way too old man. The Nissan Sentra B16 was introduced in 2000. Frankly speaking that model is a decade old and approx RM85k to RM89k depending on transmission, its absolutely bad value for money buying new.
And no, the 1.6L in the Sentra is not more powerful than the 1.5L cars.
Nissan Sentra Manual, weights 1138kg
QG16DE 88 kW (118 hp)@6000 rpm, 165 N·m (122 lb·ft)@4000 rpm
Toyota Vios 1.5J, weights 1020kg
1NZ-FE 80 kW (110 hp) at 6000 rpm with 141 Nm (103 ft·lbf) of torque at 4200 rpm
On paper it has a wee bit more power, but it is also 118kg heavier, so in actual fact, its about the same or worst.
At RM78,999, the 1.8 Manual Inspira will slaughter the Nissan Sentra RM85k in terms of handling, performance and safety. And obviously, price as well. NVH I will guess that the Inspira will be better, since it is introduced in 2007 by Mitsubishi and refined/improved by Proton in 2010. I'm sure its better than a competitor of the same category from the last decade.
Happy motoring![]()
Bro Ixeo,
Well said man... I enjoy reading your argument:proud:
Inspira 1.8 manual seems a bargain for sub RM 80k new car.
But, being grown-up with proton, since saga era until Gen-2, I would say the build quality and durability quality still frightening me. BUT, it could be different with Inspira. I could be wrong.
Now, I'm playing wait-and-see before putting my deposit on Inspira. Let it rolled on the road for another 6 months and see what's the comments/feedback from the owners of Inspira.![]()
I've actually test driven some Sentras (both manual & AT) and performance wise it's ok as expected of a 1.6ltr class car. Yea I know it's an old design, but I honestly still prefer this look than many of the new cars like Vios, City, or Inspira (cuz I don't like the fat looking proportions of those cars!). Currently the Sentra is also having a huge discount (up to 10K) plus the look can be very much improved after adding the newest Impul kit! :D
As for the Inspira, yes the performance should be better than the Sentra, but again I don't like the current Mitsu styling at all and it's a 1.8 which requires much higher road tax, plus as BE5RSK said, it's a Proton which I really doubt in terms of quality (surely engine & drive train would be good, but everything else are still doubtful).
if your emphasis on looks is so important, you should just buy the car you like and not ask in a public forum. you seem more like you've made a choice and you want us to convince you that it is a good one.
sadly, based on objective facts, its not. I'm not going to discuss on looks cause its subjective. its your money man, spend it where you want to.
Looks is indeed an important factor for me cus I don't want to spend a lot of money and end up looking at something that makes my eye sore everyday! But of course I also consider the technical and quality aspects and try to balance them out to get my final decision. If you really read my first post carefully on this, I asked if there's something wrong/issues/problems with the Sentra, so I didn't even start by bringing up the looks! Does the car have quality issues with the engine/brakes/suspension/electrical, etc2? So that's actually my intention of the question which is a valid question (as I never had any experience with Nissan). You just mentioned that it's an old design but IMHO being old design doesn't necessarily mean it's bad. Then you brought up Vios & Inspira which I really don't like in terms of looks, so of course I mentioned it.
IMHO Vios is also actually inferior to the Sentra by any means, not just the looks. The Inspira I also already admit technically should be a better performer but again I said there's the factor of quality which unfortunately Proton is not known for, not just the looks. My dislike on the looks of both those cars just the final nail on the coffin for me not to consider them.
Btw FYI most likely I won't buy the Sentra anyway! Instead, I'm now interested to buy the Livina which is actually a car I like less than the Sentra in terms of looks but better fits my purpose in the other aspects. So it's not like I've decided to buy a Sentra because of the looks and just want to get your convincing here! :P
i only wonder if the TS actually purchased a car now, its been 3 months
From that perspective, fair enough. Being old is not bad. The only issue though, is on chassis/safety aspect, crumple zones and how technology has advanced. The comparison I drew with the Vios & Inspira is simply because its in the same price bracket, looks notwithstanding. (again, looks are subjective so no point going there.) The point I try to drive home is simply Sentra is not worth buying new, reason being it delivers bad value for money. (paying 8xk for something that is technically outdated and discontinued)
The Grand Livina is a good choice, having driven the Latio 1.6 & 1.8, I personally feel the 1.6 is the better engine. Though I think it doesn't belong in this thread since its not a car. LOL. That being said I personally prefer the styling of the Alza, but that's just me.
...