Which is da best? Ron 95..shell,bhp,esso???

[BeCool]

BHP 95 is the best for my car.
I tried shell n petronas, car become sluggish.
Then tried esso, car will shake after it is started the engine for a while (Weird)

After use bhp, engine very smooth, car very stable, and smooth n powerful than other 95.
so far bhp 95 is the best for my car.

 

[thomasyong2525235]

Been using Esso all the way RON95 for my City & RON97 for Swift Sport else will be Caltex and lastly BHP. No to Petronas & Shell, very sluggish...

Really? I only find Esso 97 good...Esso's 95 for my cars have been sluggish....hhmmm,found Petronas and Shell's 95 much better.....wonder why?

 

[ExceL]

After looking at the launch of the new BHP stuff.. I'm thinking of switching, looks very goooodd.. yummmm;

BHPetrol launches new Infiniti Advanced 2x petrol – Euro 3 fuel with the latest German additive package - Image 136399

 

[BeCool]

u mz try the new bhp, really the best ron95 petrol =)

 

[vr2turbo]

u mz try the new bhp, really the best ron95 petrol =)

What improvements?

 

[infinity.melvin]

just tried bhp 97. only done half tank. seems ok though haha..
not sure the new bhp formulation is for 95 or 97, or both though

 

[vr2turbo]

just tried bhp 97. only done half tank. seems ok though haha..
not sure the new bhp formulation is for 95 or 97, or both though

Wah! you use Ron 97 ah!......

 

[amrancharger]

i tried petronas last week due to no other choice at dat moment.
wat i can say is dat the performance improve alot then their previous formula.
however i still get less mileage of 30-50km per full tank.
usually one full tank of esso can last around 330 to 350km before need to fill up again, depending on my right foot.hehehe.
but last week my mileage was only around 310km.

one other thing i notice was, harder to start my car early in the morning, need to crank a couple of time.i wonder y...

 

[kazukimy]

i tried petronas last week due to no other choice at dat moment.
wat i can say is dat the performance improve alot then their previous formula.
however i still get less mileage of 30-50km per full tank.
usually one full tank of esso can last around 330 to 350km before need to fill up again, depending on my right foot.hehehe.
but last week my mileage was only around 310km.

one other thing i notice was, harder to start my car early in the morning, need to crank a couple of time.i wonder y...

happened to me too, nw pump back shell, slightly better, stay away from petronas,lolz

 

[DareDan]

same to me.. I pump shell and is much better and save fuel than petronas. my gf all the while she pump petronas and when she change to Shell she said she feel the car is like much more response and like can fly...

 

[steven_323f]

Starting my ride use Shell Vpower97 but since price increase so i change to Shell Fuel Saving 95 but performance drop. So i try BHP95 and it perform better then Shell 95 but still not as good as VPower 97 but for daily use still ok for me.

 

[amrancharger]

happened to me too, nw pump back shell, slightly better, stay away from petronas,lolz

got no choice.only petronas is widely available and easily accessible..huhuhu...

 

[Dayline668]

i tried petronas last week due to no other choice at dat moment.
wat i can say is dat the performance improve alot then their previous formula.
however i still get less mileage of 30-50km per full tank.
usually one full tank of esso can last around 330 to 350km before need to fill up again, depending on my right foot.hehehe.
but last week my mileage was only around 310km.

one other thing i notice was, harder to start my car early in the morning, need to crank a couple of time.i wonder y...

Mine was other way around, petronas run 20km more then other no matter how i drove it, esso did have quieter engine. shell is the worst.

 

[dixonleong]

1. Shell (power wise so so , but really got more milleage) 400-480KM
2. Esso (got power but no milleage) 350-400KM
3. Petronas / BHP (no milleage , power same as Shell) 330-360KM

Above milleage on my heavy 2.0 Citra, daily road trip from PJ - Cyber (50% suburb, 50% highway)

and based on full tank avg 40.5litres

 

[Supra_Fanatics]

1. Shell (power wise so so , but really got more milleage) 400-480KM
2. Esso (got power but no milleage) 350-400KM
3. Petronas / BHP (no milleage , power same as Shell) 330-360KM

Above milleage on my heavy 2.0 Citra, daily road trip from PJ - Cyber (50% suburb, 50% highway)

and based on full tank avg 40.5litres

Got to try out all the petrol only can know which is best I guess...

So far try out on my Kelisa 1.0 A/T.
City Drives + Highways like LDP/Sungai Buloh

400KM for RM56.50. Good FC? Pump Shell FuelSave RON 95

Roughly 0.07 sens per KM? If not wrong...

 

[Dayline668]

SF.. how much your BLM run full tank..? I suspect my sister car problem, RM50 only 230-240km only, drink more then my 1.6.

 

[vr2turbo]

Starting my ride use Shell Vpower97 but since price increase so i change to Shell Fuel Saving 95 but performance drop. So i try BHP95 and it perform better then Shell 95 but still not as good as VPower 97 but for daily use still ok for me.

Probably your car needs higher Ron to run better.....

 

[cvkit17]

SF.. how much your BLM run full tank..? I suspect my sister car problem, RM50 only 230-240km only, drink more then my 1.6.

Bro hrs is 1.3 or 1.6? My friend's 1.3 RM60 runs less than 250km...:hmmmm:

 

[Dayline668]

Bro hrs is 1.3 or 1.6? My friend's 1.3 RM60 runs less than 250km...:hmmmm:

1.3... It seem BLM not fuel efficient as claim by proton... Maybe a specific batch tuning problem?:hmmmm:

 

[vr2turbo]

1. Shell (power wise so so , but really got more milleage) 400-480KM
2. Esso (got power but no milleage) 350-400KM
3. Petronas / BHP (no milleage , power same as Shell) 330-360KM

Above milleage on my heavy 2.0 Citra, daily road trip from PJ - Cyber (50% suburb, 50% highway)

and based on full tank avg 40.5litres

Like that Petronas sure out already, then mix Esso and Shell get both power and mileage.....hahahaha
Jokes aside your mileage really a lot of difference between the petrol?

---------- Post added at 01:54 PM ---------- 6 hour anti-bump limit - Previous post was at 01:53 PM ----------

1.3... It seem BLM not fuel efficient as claim by proton... Maybe a specific batch tuning problem?:hmmmm:

Heard from my friend also say not fuel efficient.....:hmmmm: