Formula 1News

Flavio’s Back: Former Renault Boss Has His Ban Overturned By French Court

flavio briatore

Flavio Briatore’s indefinite ban from motorsport has been overturned by the Tribunal de Grande Instance in Paris.

The court reversed the decision of the World Motor Sports Council (WMSC), which hit Briatore with the ban for his part in conspiring to cause a deliberate crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix. Briatore was also awarded €15,000 (US$21,600) compensation, although that figure was short of the €1 million (US$1.44m) he was seeking. The French court gave the FIA 15 days to pay or face a €10,000 per day fine.

The FIA’s lawyer Jean-Francois Prat told Associated Press that the governing body would likely launch an appeal, preventing Briatore from returning to the sport until the appeals process had run its course. However, if the judgement stands Briatore’s lawyer Philippe Ouakrat said: “We are in a situation in which Mr Briatore is reinstated in all his capacities to act in Formula One or motorsport.”

Ouakrat argued that the FIA had exceeded its authority by imposing the sanction and that Briatore was targeted because of his tense relationship with ex-FIA president Max Mosley.

“We have the feeling that some justice has been reinstated,” Ouakrat said. “I’m certain that the court was quite shocked by the way that the decision was made against Mr Briatore.”

The judge told the court that the FIA’s evidence was weak, and that lawyers were unable to question witnesses because their identity was withheld.

Ex-Renault director of engineering, Pat Symonds, also had his five-year ban overturned for his part in the scandal. He was awarded US$7,200 compensation, again well short of the US$722,000 he had sought.

Renault got off relatively lightly from the original WMSC hearing, with a two-year suspended ban, and decided not to appeal. Driver Nelson Piquet Jnr was given immunity in exchange for evidence.

Source: ESPNF1

D
  • D
    drMpower
  • Jan 6, 2010
this case will open up a can of worm i believe. i mean no in the way of getting people punished, but in the way of people GETTING away with this kind of activity.

this is a farce; a weak prosecution leads to flavio being free. this is an exploitation of the weak court law, instead of applying the strength of laws to prove one innocence. how absurd is that.

weak prosecution doesnt mean he never tell that stupid kid to not crash. why i say nelson a stupid kid? he followed everything flavio said, including of he himself crashing in the middle of a grand prix.

so if nelson is now almost unemployable due to morality, i believe the same must goes to flavio.
Z
  • Z
    zain
  • Jan 6, 2010
Hate seeing the old fart face. He had some pretty "colourful" past with entangled many times with the law.


Better retired, stay low and go home jaga cucu....hahahahah
F
  • F
    FVel
  • Jan 7, 2010
It sure as hell does not mean that Flavio was not guilty of doing what he did because his involvement in the 'Crashgate' affair was already proven.

The Appeals Tribunal was not disputing that evidence.

It merely said the FIA had acted out of its Charter because the Charter did not give power to the FIA to render a lifetime ban. In other words, the ban was overturned on a legal technicality eventhough the evidence of Flavio's actions was not disputed.

So now we have this ludicrous situation of the guilty party claiming justice and compensation on grounds of technicality. Just goes to show how screwed up the law and lawywers can be.

Irrespective of whether this guy returns to F1, he will forever be remembered as a cheat of the worst kind.
D
  • D
    drMpower
  • Jan 7, 2010
and now this chap is going to sue almost everybody. who he thinks he is? nelson mandela?

even mandela doesnt speak shitty things about the others.
D