B20-CRV VTEC - Why it Blows.....

Johnny_9

Known Member
Senior Member
Jul 16, 2005
278
0
1,516
KL
"In automobile development, the weight reduction is and always has been a significant and challenging issue. When the weight of the engine itself is to be reduced, the proportion of the weight reduction accounted for by the cylinder block is very large and thus very necessary," asserts Honda. The company has been vigorously developing and producing engines, many of whose major components are aluminum, particularly cylinder blocks. It adds, "Cast iron sleeves are being used as cylinder liners in more aluminum engines; this is an obstacle to further weight reduction." Some of the solutions Honda suggests are use of 1) a hyper-eutectic aluminum-silicon alloy (A390), 2) an aluminum liner on which Ni-SiC powdered dispersed plating is applied, and 3) a metal matrix composite, any of which enables the production of a linerless light-alloy cylinder block. At present, its cost is prohibitively high and its manufacturing process too complex for volume-production vehicle models.

So the more-commonly used technology is separate iron liners cast in the aluminum block, which in Honda engines requires at least a 9 mm minimum distance (web) between cylinders. These factors determine an engine's outer size in proportion to its cubic displacement, and there lies, literally, a rub.

In more practical considerations, Honda was readying its first compact sports utility vehicle, the CR-V, which would be produced, including its aluminum engine, at the company's Suzuka factory, the home of Civic cars. In fact, the CR-V, though a considerably larger vehicle, belongs to the broad Civic strategy that the company was pursuing, and that would produce more variants and derivatives.

The CR-V, with good off-road capability, would need an engine with about a 2.0-L displacement. Honda's type F20A engine of the Accord family, with its width of 694 mm, would not fit in the shell, and comes from another factory source. The engine must be of the compact type-B family, for the sporty Civic and Integra cars. The type B16A 1.6-L unit, and the B18B 1.8-L version, shared the same block with with the engine's overall width of 601 mm. The B18B's 1834-cc capacity was obtained by stroking the B16A to 89 mm. Further enlargement to a planned 2.0-L capacity could only be achieved by increasing the bore of the B18B, however, the engine's high-pressure die cast aluminum block with separate iron liners left no room for such enlargement. Thus the development of a new one-piece cast liner unit with four integrally cast cylinder liners came about, which Honda describes as "consecutive liner construction," or "quad-sequential sleeve block." It is more like Siamese-quadruplets. With this liner construction, the web distance, or distance between the inner walls of the adjoining cylinders, could be reduced to 6 mm from the separate lines' 9 mm, while retaining the same bore pitch. This was the essential requirement so that the new block could be cast and machined on the existing Suzuka lines. This enabled the addition of 3 mm to the bore, to 84 mm which, combined with the B18B's 89 mm stroke, increases the engine's cubic capacity to 1972 cc. Further, the increase in block mass is only 0.8 kg, from the B18B's 25.3 kg to 26.1 kg. Efforts were made to shave mass from other internal and external components of the B20B, achieving the end result of a total dry mass of 144.5 kg for the new engine, to the smaller displacement B18B's 148.1 kg, making it one of the lightest in its displacement category.

There were a number of technical problems that accompanied the new block construction that had to be solved. The main problems and solutions were as follows:

Deterioration in cylinder cooling because of the mono-liner construction--The liner connecting point between two cylinders is the most critical area that may be affected by different temperatures between the two materials, the aluminum block and the cast iron liner (there is no coolant passage in this area). A number of connecting point configurations were investigated at WOT at 6000 rpm. An optimized connecting point configuration with the least temperature rise in the area and in the aluminum portion was selected to ensure adequate cooling capability.
Casting gap that may develop between the iron liner and the aluminum block body during aluminum's solidification process--With the mono-liner, the direction of molten aluminum's solidification is different from that of casting-in separate liners. Residual stress exerts inwardly and fairly evenly in the case of separate liners, whereas with the mono-liner unit, its direction is outward along the aluminum casting's outer periphery, thus causing a separation or gap. Honda's solution was the casting of "spines," tiny cylindrical protrusions on the outer surfaces of the critical areas of the liners that ensure secure bonding of the two materials. Honda reports that gap occurrence has been reduced to one percent of what it would be without the spines.
Damaging of the casting and spine by residual stress--The spines receive solidification and contracting forces, thus the area around the liner wall connecting point is subjected to extremely high residual stress, which may damage the spines or crack the aluminum casing. A clamp placed atop each cylinder liner, that provides a path to molten aluminum, disperses concentration of stress, making it similar to that of a separate liner.
Liner distortion due to casting stress--In the mono-liner block casting, contracting force is greater in the X axis (the block's lengthwise direction), that may deform the cylinder bore shape. The mono-liner unit has calculated, slightly oblong circular shapes that re-form to true circular shapes during cooling. Further, the liner unit's bottom portion is subjected to higher solidification stress, bcause of larger aluminum mass in the area. The liner is, therefore, initially shaped as a frustum, which re-forms into a right circular cylinder in casting.
A senior Honda engineer says that mono-liner casting techniques had been presented in papers, the oldest by Ford to his knowledge, and some six years ago by Daihatsu; however, one has reached actual product application. Honda has applied for 13 patents comprising 44 items, according to the engineer.
 

D-IV

Known Member
Senior Member
Mar 11, 2006
262
1
1,518
Very good info... Read this a while back. Keep the tune conservative and cooling in top notch, it should'nt crack at all. Ofcourse its the weakest amongst the b-series due to the one piece sleeve design.
 

shiroitenshi

3,000 RPM
Senior Member
Apr 18, 2006
3,676
170
1,663
Woah, zth is alive again, those freq maintainance and server downs were really turning me off.

back to topic

someone once told me he ran 32degs on his b20b at WOT (peak load?)

while in real life, I'm fighting knock at timings way below that. Sure I can set it at 32, and hope that the P30/honda knock sensor retards the timing, but one day the knock sensor fails, kablooie engine. There's also the problem of trying to differentiate between knock and piston slap, but that one is solved in a rather mundane way.


Well, still waiting for the vacuum log, before the ITB install. Won't be much different i'd guess, big throttle bodies, but breathing out a 2.25 inch exhaust.

As to why b20B blows, it's sometimes the tune as well. A lot of people run piggybacks on B20B setups. One problem with this is that honda P30 ecu retards the ignition upon hearing knock. And that confuses the tuner who tunes the ride. What we see on the mapping aren't the real life timings and duty cycle. (honestly speaking though, it's hard to f**k up a tune unless you tune blind, and believe B20B can put out 250whp WITHOUT some serious mods) And I edited that word for accuracy.. SOMETIMES ITs the tune, prolly 90% of the time, it's parts failure due to overevving..

"Oi, my b20b can make 9500rpm!, I did it a few times yesterday.. I'm going to show you today I can do it too.... Vrooommm--BOOOM!"

Lesson: If it works a few times, it MAY not work all the time.

Anyway..
For a B20b, I think most should never ever opt for piggybacks, but invest in standalones.

A second possible reason is injectors. You can bump up fuel regulator and use H22A injectors with the resistor packs, but it's not a long term solution. If the resistor box fails, the injectors will deliver fuel differently, and that's where one of the problems begin. or start to put out fuel intermittently (lean sauce, anyone?)

Another is loose piston to bore clearances. Most B20bs are loose, and they get loose a lot faster than B16s due to the rod stroke ratio and the rod angle. Piston slap, faster wear, and soon enough, low compression and bye bye engine.

Then again, if you daily drive a B20b, it probably won't cost much to maintain. since you probably won't be revving it up to 8K every day.

Love the low end torque, makes driving a breeze, and sometimes you wonder if you really needed VTEC :P
 
Last edited:

D-IV

Known Member
Senior Member
Mar 11, 2006
262
1
1,518
I run that amount of timing with no problem. But that was on Stock block b20b with p3f pistons (valve pocket modified for clearance). Btw, i can run those high timings due to the low compression and it lasted me the beating everyday until i sold it off. But had to retard timing after 6500rpm to 28 degrees flat though.

Not sure what octane rating you guys are running over there. We're using 97 as pump here. But even the Australian tuner smelt that our fuel seems to be acting like a 100 octane. He must've have some sensitive nose to quantify it :biggrin:
 

dcloo

1,500 RPM
Senior Member
May 11, 2005
1,784
17
3,138
kl
:adore: its really good explain of b-series family built.....
 

dcloo

1,500 RPM
Senior Member
May 11, 2005
1,784
17
3,138
kl
n no wonder dcloo engine blown for so many times.... its b20... kekekekke.....
m i rite loo? :biggrin:
you are wrong ....... mine was b18c r std
 

pencalat

500 RPM
Senior Member
Nov 20, 2006
805
19
1,518
JB
thanx 4 the info..
blown my engine last month..
now left at danau kota woksop...
but, why can't use the piggyback??
 

D-IV

Known Member
Senior Member
Mar 11, 2006
262
1
1,518
Ever found out why it blew?
 

Random Post Every 5 Minutes

hi all, i'm planning to buy a new engine on my wira aeroback 1.3..going for half-cut....my choice is Mivec 1.6+rear breakdisk but without putting in the dashboard,and bodykit to save my $$$$...i'm preparing about 7k in about 4 month...is it possible to get a rear breakdisk and mivec engine for only 7k...can u advise how much money should i prepare....

and can you guys list down what kind of meter can i put into my car ofter my mivec transplant example = autotimer,mivec...
Ask a question, start a discussion or post something for sale!
Post thread

Online now

Enjoying Zerotohundred?

Log-in for an ad-less experience