Jeffrey Lee said:
What ever the dyno jet test result & all the explanation i had already reply. All the fact is genuine. No hanky panky things here. I really don't like to do that either. What for I want to lie on the chart report and about the goods things i did mentioned from the previous reply. For me, If my product doesn't work or did not perform, then what for I want to invite you guys to come over at our center to do the free testing on the K2N. Don't you guys think, it will be waste of time. Right !
Lots of crap products that don't work offer free testing. Surbo, Cyclone, Air Injector, stupid fuel line magnets, and all that bullshit all have free testing arrangements. So just because you offer free testing doesn't mean your product actually works.
Whatever the case, posting a dyno chart that you claim is from an L200 Turbo Diesel when it's clearly from a small CC petrol engine clearly qualifies as hanky-panky. Or are you saying that posting a misleading chart in an attempt to misrepresent your product does not equate to hanky-panky?
Now, it may just be that you didn't know that the chart doesn't belong to an L200 with a 2.5TD engine, which would mean that you're not knowingly trying to fleece us, but that also isn't very reassuring either.
Sorry if any of this offends you. I'm merely pointing out the very glaring discrepancies in your products claims.
Don't get angry with me. Get angry with the guy who prepares the promo material for your product.