I think it makes sense. You see when you buy a brand new Proton it is almost rubbish to begin with. After 5 years its rubbish so it won't pass Puspakom.From Miros, they said half of the country's 5 years old car all cant pass the puspakom, seriously? And another more shit, 5 years car go inspection, 15 years old go scrap, if this practical, even proton wira all pun kena scrap.... Reduce greatly the car price, make a camry selling 80-90 k that same price as japan instead of 160-190 k in malaysia then i will say this policy practical...
Even with tax reduction, those poor people with old cars still need to fork out some money to buy a replacement car. I don't think it is easy for the poor people to buy another car even if it is cheap...From Miros, they said half of the country's 5 years old car all cant pass the puspakom, seriously? And another more shit, 5 years car go inspection, 15 years old go scrap, if this practical, even proton wira all pun kena scrap.... Reduce greatly the car price, make a camry selling 80-90 k that same price as japan instead of 160-190 k in malaysia then i will say this policy practical...
because people here sees it as money sucking decision...a bid by the cronist...any action from the current government must be fishy..Hmm I wonder how strict the inspection will be and how much will it cost.
Actually in most advanced countries, such inspection is already a norm once a year when ever the owner needs to extend the registration (or in here road tax) for any vehicles. The inspection should be done at govt. authorized workshops, and it will cover basic road worthiness, like is steering, brakes, lights, horn, and other basic functions still working, exhaust emission still within limits, tires still in acceptable condition, bodywork still acceptable, and no illegal modifications. If like that, then maybe still not bad, but if it's too strict and used to milk people for money, then that's bad.
Support. Inspection should be enough. No need to scrap.I think scrapping cars (and thus buying new ones) and sending cars to inspections..........and "excuses" for the govt to more milk money from the rakyat.....
Would the inspection of cars help??
Just look at the public transportation in Malaysia that requires constant inspection on buses, lorries, etc....AND just look at no. of cases when the buses plunges to a ravine or (repeatedly) involved in road accidents. Makes me wonder if those inspectors are really doing their job..
they shud have cut off the tax n duty first..[/QUOTE
if they not cut but do not impost tax @ taxes r according to our income maybe i'd tag along on agreeing. but than again driving wit all stock cars on the road doesn't seem right, furthermore how'd the insurance gonna charge us for our car as I don't know how does they do it in Singapore 2
They had come out with new proton accordana to replace old perdana, so all new cars..bro, government need money bro!!!! now 55 Puspakom, after this rule begin then more puspakom is building. 1 building 1M but government claim 5M from raykat.
then after 5 years car failed inspection will be certified. fXXk govertment please think ur polis, askar, apa apa department la...... their private car is illegal modify plus over 15 years. not all government ppl. c who die first.
plus big number of government car is over 15 years... then govertment claim all government car certified, come in new car. example come in 10 inspira then wan claim raykat 10m. Each car(100K) claim 1m coz wan put sticker(50k), laptop(50k),LED roof light(100K), or apa apa advance technology on the boot(700k) but mostly is useless......!!!!!!!!!
$$$$$ government $$$$$$
JIb Gor........ think urself la.......