i would agree on that , good posti just did some research regarding turbo setup on carburetor engine.
basically it is divided into 2 types, either suck or blow.
For suck/draw through setup, turbo suck air from the carburetor. (carb->turbo->intake)
For blow through setup, turbo blow air through carburetor. (turbo->carb->intake)
don't dare to comment much since i believe there are lot more ppl know much than i do.
hehhe turbo still same:wavey:- tuner is important here determine 'brape besar jet mau pakai'I already done before since 2004 with a fiat 1.8L carby turbo.with std carby and stock ignition u have a trouble when boost come in.Carby jet is not enough to flow the fuel.What we do we remain the carby and add the MT4 fuel controller.we fine with fueling and retard timing with MSD boost ignition controler.Low budget but good whp.SUCK or FLOW it is not big deal.Huge....
Bump: Base turbo u can use a small turbo...Awesome in USA carby turbo can make 9sc
Bump: Base turbo u can use a small turbo...Awesome in USA carby turbo can make 9sc
sifu,i would agree on that , good post
if i were to make a carb turbo, i would obviously choose carb->turbo->intake
but there are some drawbacks too,
first things first , this method is the easier way because you can use any big carb to make this setup , the blow through setup requires you to have a Turbo Capability Carb which detects boost and supplies more fuel. The Suck/Draw setup sucks air + fuel , the more air , the more fuel its gonna bring in , but the drawback is that you gonna suck fuel + air into the turbo which might not be that good for the turbo's seals and compressor wheel.